In our comparison of Bullhorn vs. SugarCRM, SugarCRM is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
As the person who operates this system in our organization, I love how it is very flexible in all cases, the ability to edit and customize data easily, creating new fields, customize reports and creating custom dashboard has been a great help. The support team has also been a great help when I have some issues. Great software for everyone.
General Comments: The big companies will find it very beneficial.
Listing all my employees on my business page is easy with it.
Email viewing is not attractive.
One of the best things about Bullhorn is that it has an integrated email system, which makes it easier for me to email my co-workers and candidates. I also like that it gives me the ability to add more information about our prospects into the system quickly.
Bullhorn is clunky and not that easy to use. Some of its features are also not intuitive as well.
I have worked with Sugar CRM and created numerous add-ons for consulting projects.
Flexible, a nice development model if you personally want to host the CRM, almost all can be extended in PHP, the cost is lower compared to Salesforce.
A dated UI, tabs are poorly displayed.
As the person who operates this system in our organization, I love how it is very flexible in all cases, the ability to edit and customize data easily, creating new fields, customize reports and creating custom dashboard has been a great help. The support team has also been a great help when I have some issues. Great software for everyone.
One of the best things about Bullhorn is that it has an integrated email system, which makes it easier for me to email my co-workers and candidates. I also like that it gives me the ability to add more information about our prospects into the system quickly.
Bullhorn is clunky and not that easy to use. Some of its features are also not intuitive as well.
General Comments: The big companies will find it very beneficial.
Listing all my employees on my business page is easy with it.
Email viewing is not attractive.
I have worked with Sugar CRM and created numerous add-ons for consulting projects.
Flexible, a nice development model if you personally want to host the CRM, almost all can be extended in PHP, the cost is lower compared to Salesforce.
A dated UI, tabs are poorly displayed.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Bullhorn vs. SugarCRM, Bullhorn has 67 user reviews and SugarCRM has 39. The average star rating for Bullhorn is 4.10 while SugarCRM has an average rating of 4.07. Bullhorn has more positive reviews than SugarCRM. Comparing Bullhorn vs. SugarCRM reviews, Bullhorn has stronger overall reviews.
Bullhorn vs. SugarCRM both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Customer Management, Lead Management, Campaign Management, Supported Channels, Campaign Types, Accounting Features, Reporting & Analytics, Customizable Items, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Systems/Administrative, Integration Options, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Help Desk Features, Limits, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of Bullhorn vs. SugarCRM, SugarCRM offers more of the most popular features and tools than Bullhorn.
In our pricing comparison of Bullhorn vs. SugarCRM, SugarCRM's pricing starts at $49/month and is more affordable compared to SugarCRM's starting cost of $49/month.
Our comparison of Bullhorn vs. SugarCRM shows that SugarCRM scores higher in usability for learning curve, setup & support, quality of support. Bullhorn scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, ease of admin, but SugarCRM has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
