In our comparison of Avaya UCaaS vs. MiTeam Meetings, MiTeam Meetings is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The product effectively addresses the need for remote communication, enabling me to connect with customers from the comfort of my home. However, the limitation in telecom provider compatibility remains an area for improvement.
The ability to call customers and answer their calls using my office extension from anywhere, including home, is a standout feature.
The product does not work with any telecom provider, limiting its compatibility.
Solves the crucial problems of maintaining communication during lockdown and facilitating smooth collaboration on projects. It has greatly benefited me in staying connected with my team and ensuring efficient teamwork.
Easy-to-use interface. It makes it effortless for me to stay connected with colleagues and collaborate effectively.
one thing I dislike is that it is not widely used across organizations. Many organizations, including mine, have transitioned to a different software called Teams, which, in my opinion, is not as user-friendly.
The product successfully addresses the challenge of user interface complexity, providing a straightforward experience for new users.
Easy-to-use interface complemented by readily available documentation.
A concern arises with the availability of new features and software updates, particularly in addressing compatibility issues.
Solves the crucial problems of maintaining communication during lockdown and facilitating smooth collaboration on projects. It has greatly benefited me in staying connected with my team and ensuring efficient teamwork.
Easy-to-use interface. It makes it effortless for me to stay connected with colleagues and collaborate effectively.
one thing I dislike is that it is not widely used across organizations. Many organizations, including mine, have transitioned to a different software called Teams, which, in my opinion, is not as user-friendly.
The product effectively addresses the need for remote communication, enabling me to connect with customers from the comfort of my home. However, the limitation in telecom provider compatibility remains an area for improvement.
The ability to call customers and answer their calls using my office extension from anywhere, including home, is a standout feature.
The product does not work with any telecom provider, limiting its compatibility.
The product successfully addresses the challenge of user interface complexity, providing a straightforward experience for new users.
Easy-to-use interface complemented by readily available documentation.
A concern arises with the availability of new features and software updates, particularly in addressing compatibility issues.
Solves the crucial problems of maintaining communication during lockdown and facilitating smooth collaboration on projects. It has greatly benefited me in staying connected with my team and ensuring efficient teamwork.
Easy-to-use interface. It makes it effortless for me to stay connected with colleagues and collaborate effectively.
one thing I dislike is that it is not widely used across organizations. Many organizations, including mine, have transitioned to a different software called Teams, which, in my opinion, is not as user-friendly.
Solves the crucial problems of maintaining communication during lockdown and facilitating smooth collaboration on projects. It has greatly benefited me in staying connected with my team and ensuring efficient teamwork.
Easy-to-use interface. It makes it effortless for me to stay connected with colleagues and collaborate effectively.
one thing I dislike is that it is not widely used across organizations. Many organizations, including mine, have transitioned to a different software called Teams, which, in my opinion, is not as user-friendly.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Avaya UCaaS vs. MiTeam Meetings, Avaya UCaaS has 23 user reviews and MiTeam Meetings has 15. The average star rating for Avaya UCaaS is 4.26 while MiTeam Meetings has an average rating of 4.2. Avaya UCaaS has more positive reviews than MiTeam Meetings. Comparing Avaya UCaaS vs. MiTeam Meetings reviews, Avaya UCaaS has stronger overall reviews.
Avaya UCaaS vs. MiTeam Meetings both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Conferencing Capabilities, Presenter Controls, Remote Support Features, Chat/IM Management, Phone System Features, Call Management & Administration, Reporting & Analytics, Collaboration Tools, File Management, Language & Speech, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Supported Channels. In our feature comparison of Avaya UCaaS vs. MiTeam Meetings, MiTeam Meetings offers more of the most popular features and tools than Avaya UCaaS.
In our pricing comparison of Avaya UCaaS vs. MiTeam Meetings, MiTeam Meetings's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to MiTeam Meetings's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Avaya UCaaS vs. MiTeam Meetings shows that MiTeam Meetings scores higher in usability for ease of use, ease of admin. Avaya UCaaS scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, but MiTeam Meetings has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
