In our comparison of LifeSize Video Conferencing vs. MiTeam Meetings, MiTeam Meetings is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
We are extremely satisfied with this software. After facing cost increases in previous Polycom solutions, Lifesize is a boon to us for 3 years of adopting it.
Lifesize provides very good equipment for video conferencing and client software for mobiles and computers. They are simple to use even by a non-technical person. Its cloud service is a trustworthy and stable platform. It integrates well with Skype too.
Those who do not want to install the software they have a web version of LifeCloud service via Google Chrome. But this becomes a drawback when inviting other users. Lifesize should make improvements to facilitate other users.
Solves the crucial problems of maintaining communication during lockdown and facilitating smooth collaboration on projects. It has greatly benefited me in staying connected with my team and ensuring efficient teamwork.
Easy-to-use interface. It makes it effortless for me to stay connected with colleagues and collaborate effectively.
one thing I dislike is that it is not widely used across organizations. Many organizations, including mine, have transitioned to a different software called Teams, which, in my opinion, is not as user-friendly.
For remote team meetings and conferences, it is good.
It is a web-based app with a nice quality of video and audio. Compatible to all device types.
Limited features, speed is slow and the presentation screen arrangement is not attractive.
Solves the crucial problems of maintaining communication during lockdown and facilitating smooth collaboration on projects. It has greatly benefited me in staying connected with my team and ensuring efficient teamwork.
Easy-to-use interface. It makes it effortless for me to stay connected with colleagues and collaborate effectively.
one thing I dislike is that it is not widely used across organizations. Many organizations, including mine, have transitioned to a different software called Teams, which, in my opinion, is not as user-friendly.
We are extremely satisfied with this software. After facing cost increases in previous Polycom solutions, Lifesize is a boon to us for 3 years of adopting it.
Lifesize provides very good equipment for video conferencing and client software for mobiles and computers. They are simple to use even by a non-technical person. Its cloud service is a trustworthy and stable platform. It integrates well with Skype too.
Those who do not want to install the software they have a web version of LifeCloud service via Google Chrome. But this becomes a drawback when inviting other users. Lifesize should make improvements to facilitate other users.
For remote team meetings and conferences, it is good.
It is a web-based app with a nice quality of video and audio. Compatible to all device types.
Limited features, speed is slow and the presentation screen arrangement is not attractive.
Solves the crucial problems of maintaining communication during lockdown and facilitating smooth collaboration on projects. It has greatly benefited me in staying connected with my team and ensuring efficient teamwork.
Easy-to-use interface. It makes it effortless for me to stay connected with colleagues and collaborate effectively.
one thing I dislike is that it is not widely used across organizations. Many organizations, including mine, have transitioned to a different software called Teams, which, in my opinion, is not as user-friendly.
Solves the crucial problems of maintaining communication during lockdown and facilitating smooth collaboration on projects. It has greatly benefited me in staying connected with my team and ensuring efficient teamwork.
Easy-to-use interface. It makes it effortless for me to stay connected with colleagues and collaborate effectively.
one thing I dislike is that it is not widely used across organizations. Many organizations, including mine, have transitioned to a different software called Teams, which, in my opinion, is not as user-friendly.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of LifeSize Video Conferencing vs. MiTeam Meetings, LifeSize Video Conferencing has 43 user reviews and MiTeam Meetings has 15. The average star rating for LifeSize Video Conferencing is 4.30 while MiTeam Meetings has an average rating of 4.2. LifeSize Video Conferencing has more positive reviews than MiTeam Meetings. Comparing LifeSize Video Conferencing vs. MiTeam Meetings reviews, LifeSize Video Conferencing has stronger overall reviews.
LifeSize Video Conferencing vs. MiTeam Meetings both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Conferencing Capabilities, Presenter Controls, Remote Support Features, Chat/IM Management, Phone System Features, Call Management & Administration, Collaboration Tools, File Management, Language & Speech, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of LifeSize Video Conferencing vs. MiTeam Meetings, MiTeam Meetings offers more of the most popular features and tools than LifeSize Video Conferencing.
In our pricing comparison of LifeSize Video Conferencing vs. MiTeam Meetings, MiTeam Meetings's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to MiTeam Meetings's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of LifeSize Video Conferencing vs. MiTeam Meetings shows that MiTeam Meetings scores higher in usability for ease of use. LifeSize Video Conferencing scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support, ease of admin, but MiTeam Meetings has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
