In our comparison of HighFive Video Conferencing vs. TeamViewer, TeamViewer is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
The standout feature of cloud storage for recorded conferences adds significant value, enhancing the overall utility and efficiency of the platform. For users considering Zoom, it's crucial to evaluate the size of the groups involved in video conferences. Understanding the performance limitations with a larger number of participants can help in making an informed decision.
Zoom excels in providing a tool for conducting dynamic and high-definition videoconferences with excellent audio quality.
Zoom does have a limitation when it comes to larger groups, and when more than 90 people connect, performance tends to slow down significantly. Issues such as audio or video pausing and, at times, losing the entire video conference can occur, impacting the overall effectiveness of the platform.
It has worked well for the many years I have used it mainly to support people contacting me for tech assistance.
It functions well, it is seamless, and walking a person through the process of giving me one-time access to their computer on the phone is very simple.
It can be initially confusing for users to understand the relation between host and customer programs.
Highfive assists us to link with many remote staff and offers face to face communication and screen sharing ability. It is simple to begin feeling detached from one another seeing that our department is divided across to offices one on each coast. This software is used to aid close the gap offering us the capability to effortlessly have a combined team meeting between the two offices in our respective conference halls. Its use of screen of sharing aids us in managing to offer a simple method to fast go via PowerPoint presentations or show the team how to achieve a certain workflow.
Excellent for linking with remote staff and offering face to face conversations and screen sharing ability, ideal for corporations with numerous offices, or staff out in the field, it’s helpful even if you don’t have remote reps, the software’s sharing capabilities offer a simple method to fast walk via PowerPoint presentations or even illustrate to the team how to attain a certain workflow, and its suitable for duping your staff when they least anticipate it.
The software occasionally lags or functions slowly if you or a participant of yours in the meeting has slow internet and you can be duped by you fellow staff.
While working from home, I often use TeamViewer for short term remote logins. Setting up an account for all my machines is very simple and without using the temporary passwords provided by default by TeamViewer, one can connect with a unique password once TeamViewer is running in the background.
Using the secure file transfer window, it is simple to transfer files, if many monitors are connected to the remote PC it functions well, switching the active monitors from a remote customer is simple, it doesn’t matter the OS running on the machines on both ends as it is a cross-platform app, accessing all my desktops remotely is simple thanks to TeamViewer, remote computer seems like a seamless experience if both ends are supported by the right internet speed, and you simply need to open TeamViewer from your phone and turn your multi-touch display into a responsive trackpad for the desktop if you’re missing trackpads for your computer.
There are limitations to the free version. It may be a bad idea for a prolonged session of remote login.
The standout feature of cloud storage for recorded conferences adds significant value, enhancing the overall utility and efficiency of the platform. For users considering Zoom, it's crucial to evaluate the size of the groups involved in video conferences. Understanding the performance limitations with a larger number of participants can help in making an informed decision.
Zoom excels in providing a tool for conducting dynamic and high-definition videoconferences with excellent audio quality.
Zoom does have a limitation when it comes to larger groups, and when more than 90 people connect, performance tends to slow down significantly. Issues such as audio or video pausing and, at times, losing the entire video conference can occur, impacting the overall effectiveness of the platform.
Highfive assists us to link with many remote staff and offers face to face communication and screen sharing ability. It is simple to begin feeling detached from one another seeing that our department is divided across to offices one on each coast. This software is used to aid close the gap offering us the capability to effortlessly have a combined team meeting between the two offices in our respective conference halls. Its use of screen of sharing aids us in managing to offer a simple method to fast go via PowerPoint presentations or show the team how to achieve a certain workflow.
Excellent for linking with remote staff and offering face to face conversations and screen sharing ability, ideal for corporations with numerous offices, or staff out in the field, it’s helpful even if you don’t have remote reps, the software’s sharing capabilities offer a simple method to fast walk via PowerPoint presentations or even illustrate to the team how to attain a certain workflow, and its suitable for duping your staff when they least anticipate it.
The software occasionally lags or functions slowly if you or a participant of yours in the meeting has slow internet and you can be duped by you fellow staff.
It has worked well for the many years I have used it mainly to support people contacting me for tech assistance.
It functions well, it is seamless, and walking a person through the process of giving me one-time access to their computer on the phone is very simple.
It can be initially confusing for users to understand the relation between host and customer programs.
While working from home, I often use TeamViewer for short term remote logins. Setting up an account for all my machines is very simple and without using the temporary passwords provided by default by TeamViewer, one can connect with a unique password once TeamViewer is running in the background.
Using the secure file transfer window, it is simple to transfer files, if many monitors are connected to the remote PC it functions well, switching the active monitors from a remote customer is simple, it doesn’t matter the OS running on the machines on both ends as it is a cross-platform app, accessing all my desktops remotely is simple thanks to TeamViewer, remote computer seems like a seamless experience if both ends are supported by the right internet speed, and you simply need to open TeamViewer from your phone and turn your multi-touch display into a responsive trackpad for the desktop if you’re missing trackpads for your computer.
There are limitations to the free version. It may be a bad idea for a prolonged session of remote login.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of HighFive Video Conferencing vs. TeamViewer, HighFive Video Conferencing has 27 user reviews and TeamViewer has 103. The average star rating for HighFive Video Conferencing is 4.59 while TeamViewer has an average rating of 4.59. HighFive Video Conferencing has more positive reviews than TeamViewer. Comparing HighFive Video Conferencing vs. TeamViewer reviews, HighFive Video Conferencing has stronger overall reviews.
HighFive Video Conferencing vs. TeamViewer both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Remote Support Features, Chat/IM Management, Device Management, Collaboration Tools, File Management, Reporting & Analytics, Recording , Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Customizable Items, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Cybersecurity Features, Contact Management, Appointments/Scheduling, Limits, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of HighFive Video Conferencing vs. TeamViewer, TeamViewer offers more of the most popular features and tools than HighFive Video Conferencing.
In our pricing comparison of HighFive Video Conferencing vs. TeamViewer, HighFive Video Conferencing's pricing starts at $15/month and is more affordable compared to TeamViewer's starting cost of $24.9/month.
Our comparison of HighFive Video Conferencing vs. TeamViewer shows that TeamViewer scores higher in usability for learning curve, setup & support, quality of support. HighFive Video Conferencing scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, ease of admin, but TeamViewer has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
