In our comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. LifeSize Video Conferencing, Dialpad Meetings is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Connecting with many customers and project teams is simple using UberConference. It is simple to set up a warranted group call, run it without any problems for the most part and take care of the invites too.
My customers don’t have to pay for a subscription as most times the free plan is sufficient for a few of my smaller projects, using phone or computer for audio or calling in through browser or phone is flexible, in case a person is feeding back or making distracting noise, you can mute others on the call, novices can navigate the software with ease as the software is intuitive, well designed, and visually clean, and it is simple to share screens from inside Chrome.
Screen sharing with browsers could be added, for those viewing in browser that must mute themselves, type chat plus audio.
We are extremely satisfied with this software. After facing cost increases in previous Polycom solutions, Lifesize is a boon to us for 3 years of adopting it.
Lifesize provides very good equipment for video conferencing and client software for mobiles and computers. They are simple to use even by a non-technical person. Its cloud service is a trustworthy and stable platform. It integrates well with Skype too.
Those who do not want to install the software they have a web version of LifeCloud service via Google Chrome. But this becomes a drawback when inviting other users. Lifesize should make improvements to facilitate other users.
Extremely great client service, its design is beautifully done exclusively for screen sharing and audio conferencing purposes. Also, it directly results in an extremely clear voice and high quality high definition crisp, and during screen sharing the picture quality is exceptional.
Any team that wishes to enhance productivity should try the free or paid plans.
You can join the conference call after simply clicking a link, has exceptional screen sharing, persons up to 10 to 11 per call use it at no cost, anyone can mute the other person, you can view and talk/listen through laptop or when viewing the screen share through laptop you can call in through phone.
Lack of support of the screenshare option on Firefox browsers. The options for audio drop down tab don’t appear when connecting through laptop.
For remote team meetings and conferences, it is good.
It is a web-based app with a nice quality of video and audio. Compatible to all device types.
Limited features, speed is slow and the presentation screen arrangement is not attractive.
Connecting with many customers and project teams is simple using UberConference. It is simple to set up a warranted group call, run it without any problems for the most part and take care of the invites too.
My customers don’t have to pay for a subscription as most times the free plan is sufficient for a few of my smaller projects, using phone or computer for audio or calling in through browser or phone is flexible, in case a person is feeding back or making distracting noise, you can mute others on the call, novices can navigate the software with ease as the software is intuitive, well designed, and visually clean, and it is simple to share screens from inside Chrome.
Screen sharing with browsers could be added, for those viewing in browser that must mute themselves, type chat plus audio.
Extremely great client service, its design is beautifully done exclusively for screen sharing and audio conferencing purposes. Also, it directly results in an extremely clear voice and high quality high definition crisp, and during screen sharing the picture quality is exceptional.
Any team that wishes to enhance productivity should try the free or paid plans.
You can join the conference call after simply clicking a link, has exceptional screen sharing, persons up to 10 to 11 per call use it at no cost, anyone can mute the other person, you can view and talk/listen through laptop or when viewing the screen share through laptop you can call in through phone.
Lack of support of the screenshare option on Firefox browsers. The options for audio drop down tab don’t appear when connecting through laptop.
We are extremely satisfied with this software. After facing cost increases in previous Polycom solutions, Lifesize is a boon to us for 3 years of adopting it.
Lifesize provides very good equipment for video conferencing and client software for mobiles and computers. They are simple to use even by a non-technical person. Its cloud service is a trustworthy and stable platform. It integrates well with Skype too.
Those who do not want to install the software they have a web version of LifeCloud service via Google Chrome. But this becomes a drawback when inviting other users. Lifesize should make improvements to facilitate other users.
For remote team meetings and conferences, it is good.
It is a web-based app with a nice quality of video and audio. Compatible to all device types.
Limited features, speed is slow and the presentation screen arrangement is not attractive.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. LifeSize Video Conferencing, Dialpad Meetings has 48 user reviews and LifeSize Video Conferencing has 43. The average star rating for Dialpad Meetings is 4.52 while LifeSize Video Conferencing has an average rating of 4.30. Dialpad Meetings has more positive reviews than LifeSize Video Conferencing. Comparing Dialpad Meetings vs. LifeSize Video Conferencing reviews, Dialpad Meetings has stronger overall reviews.
Dialpad Meetings vs. LifeSize Video Conferencing both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Conferencing Capabilities, Remote Support Features, Call Management & Administration, Collaboration Tools, Language & Speech, Reminders/Alerts, Enhancements & Personalization, Reporting & Analytics, Recording , Identity and Access Management (IAM), Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. LifeSize Video Conferencing, Dialpad Meetings offers more of the most popular features and tools than LifeSize Video Conferencing.
In our pricing comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. LifeSize Video Conferencing, LifeSize Video Conferencing's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to LifeSize Video Conferencing's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. LifeSize Video Conferencing shows that Dialpad Meetings scores higher in usability for ease of use, setup & support, ease of admin. LifeSize Video Conferencing scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support, but Dialpad Meetings has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
