In our comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. GoToMeeting, GoToMeeting is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
Connecting with many customers and project teams is simple using UberConference. It is simple to set up a warranted group call, run it without any problems for the most part and take care of the invites too.
My customers don’t have to pay for a subscription as most times the free plan is sufficient for a few of my smaller projects, using phone or computer for audio or calling in through browser or phone is flexible, in case a person is feeding back or making distracting noise, you can mute others on the call, novices can navigate the software with ease as the software is intuitive, well designed, and visually clean, and it is simple to share screens from inside Chrome.
Screen sharing with browsers could be added, for those viewing in browser that must mute themselves, type chat plus audio.
Creating a business session with colleagues is simple, numerous persons can access the conference simultaneously, and screen sharing is possible.
For you to work with the system, you must pay, and it cannot be used for personal reasons.
Extremely great client service, its design is beautifully done exclusively for screen sharing and audio conferencing purposes. Also, it directly results in an extremely clear voice and high quality high definition crisp, and during screen sharing the picture quality is exceptional.
Any team that wishes to enhance productivity should try the free or paid plans.
You can join the conference call after simply clicking a link, has exceptional screen sharing, persons up to 10 to 11 per call use it at no cost, anyone can mute the other person, you can view and talk/listen through laptop or when viewing the screen share through laptop you can call in through phone.
Lack of support of the screenshare option on Firefox browsers. The options for audio drop down tab don’t appear when connecting through laptop.
For scheduling, and hosting sessions, it functions well.
Poor sound quality at times.
Connecting with many customers and project teams is simple using UberConference. It is simple to set up a warranted group call, run it without any problems for the most part and take care of the invites too.
My customers don’t have to pay for a subscription as most times the free plan is sufficient for a few of my smaller projects, using phone or computer for audio or calling in through browser or phone is flexible, in case a person is feeding back or making distracting noise, you can mute others on the call, novices can navigate the software with ease as the software is intuitive, well designed, and visually clean, and it is simple to share screens from inside Chrome.
Screen sharing with browsers could be added, for those viewing in browser that must mute themselves, type chat plus audio.
Extremely great client service, its design is beautifully done exclusively for screen sharing and audio conferencing purposes. Also, it directly results in an extremely clear voice and high quality high definition crisp, and during screen sharing the picture quality is exceptional.
Any team that wishes to enhance productivity should try the free or paid plans.
You can join the conference call after simply clicking a link, has exceptional screen sharing, persons up to 10 to 11 per call use it at no cost, anyone can mute the other person, you can view and talk/listen through laptop or when viewing the screen share through laptop you can call in through phone.
Lack of support of the screenshare option on Firefox browsers. The options for audio drop down tab don’t appear when connecting through laptop.
Creating a business session with colleagues is simple, numerous persons can access the conference simultaneously, and screen sharing is possible.
For you to work with the system, you must pay, and it cannot be used for personal reasons.
For scheduling, and hosting sessions, it functions well.
Poor sound quality at times.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. GoToMeeting, GoToMeeting has 597 user reviews and Dialpad Meetings has 48. The average star rating for GoToMeeting is 4.52 while Dialpad Meetings has an average rating of 4.52. GoToMeeting has more positive reviews than Dialpad Meetings. Comparing Dialpad Meetings vs. GoToMeeting reviews, GoToMeeting has stronger overall reviews.
Dialpad Meetings vs. GoToMeeting both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Conferencing Capabilities, Remote Support Features, Call Management & Administration, Collaboration Tools, Language & Speech, Reminders/Alerts, Enhancements & Personalization, Reporting & Analytics, Recording , Identity and Access Management (IAM), Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. GoToMeeting, Dialpad Meetings offers more of the most popular features and tools than GoToMeeting.
In our pricing comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. GoToMeeting, GoToMeeting's pricing starts at $12/month and is more affordable compared to GoToMeeting's starting cost of $12/month.
Our comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. GoToMeeting shows that GoToMeeting scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, quality of support. Dialpad Meetings scores higher in meets requirements, setup & support, ease of admin, but GoToMeeting has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
