In our comparison of Constant Contact vs. SharpSpring, SharpSpring is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
I like how simple the program is to use and maintain for surveys and email marketing. But I don't like that the membership levels are overpriced compared to the other services they provide.
Ease of handling and managing emails for advertising and surveys.
Membership plans to improve access to extra services cost more than recommended
We can now automate our marketing roles and have a wider view into our ROI on the said roles thanks to SharpSpring
Centrally collaborating a vast variety of marketing and sales features is possible.
An aspect to put a tracking code is lacking in the social planner.
For event management, Constant Contact was invaluable; it relieved me of a great deal of responsibility. My time was saved by the predesigned templates, and the marketing enabled me to get more gigs. But there's a steep price tag, no free trial, and account cancellation was a hassle.
Pre-designed templates, effective marketing
Expensive, no free version or trial
Automating organizations selling activities is possible courtesy of SarpSpring.
Has a relatively tiny learning curve at the beginning
Implementing some functions is a process.
I like how simple the program is to use and maintain for surveys and email marketing. But I don't like that the membership levels are overpriced compared to the other services they provide.
Ease of handling and managing emails for advertising and surveys.
Membership plans to improve access to extra services cost more than recommended
For event management, Constant Contact was invaluable; it relieved me of a great deal of responsibility. My time was saved by the predesigned templates, and the marketing enabled me to get more gigs. But there's a steep price tag, no free trial, and account cancellation was a hassle.
Pre-designed templates, effective marketing
Expensive, no free version or trial
We can now automate our marketing roles and have a wider view into our ROI on the said roles thanks to SharpSpring
Centrally collaborating a vast variety of marketing and sales features is possible.
An aspect to put a tracking code is lacking in the social planner.
Automating organizations selling activities is possible courtesy of SarpSpring.
Has a relatively tiny learning curve at the beginning
Implementing some functions is a process.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Constant Contact vs. SharpSpring, SharpSpring has 294 user reviews and Constant Contact has 12. The average star rating for SharpSpring is 4.63 while Constant Contact has an average rating of 4.33. SharpSpring has more positive reviews than Constant Contact. Comparing Constant Contact vs. SharpSpring reviews, SharpSpring has stronger overall reviews.
Constant Contact vs. SharpSpring both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Customer Management, Lead Management, Campaign Management, Campaign Types, Reporting & Analytics, Supported Channels, User Calls-to-Action, Chat/IM Management, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Customizable Items, Systems/Administrative, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Constant Contact vs. SharpSpring, SharpSpring offers more of the most popular features and tools than Constant Contact.
In our pricing comparison of Constant Contact vs. SharpSpring, SharpSpring's pricing starts at $449/month and is more affordable compared to Constant Contact's starting cost of $9.99/month.
Our comparison of Constant Contact vs. SharpSpring shows that SharpSpring scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Constant Contact scores higher in learning curve, but SharpSpring has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.