In our comparison of Cisco Webex vs. MiTeam Meetings, MiTeam Meetings is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
I really love the feature that enables me to pass controls from one use to the next. I’m enjoying the experience of using it for nearly all my video calling and meetings. I highly support the use of this software.
Accessing it is simple, the UI is extremely appealing, the client support service is exceptional-incredibly simple and training modules are available, passing the control is possible, calling your phone to join meetings is possible, updates to the software to enhance and offer patches are continuous, it is greatly secured and the ability to schedule meetings is easy.
The audio connections is at times problematic.
Solves the crucial problems of maintaining communication during lockdown and facilitating smooth collaboration on projects. It has greatly benefited me in staying connected with my team and ensuring efficient teamwork.
Easy-to-use interface. It makes it effortless for me to stay connected with colleagues and collaborate effectively.
one thing I dislike is that it is not widely used across organizations. Many organizations, including mine, have transitioned to a different software called Teams, which, in my opinion, is not as user-friendly.
The ideal software with complete functionality.
The first learning timeline can be misleading if you’re not conversant with the layout of CUCM.
Solves the crucial problems of maintaining communication during lockdown and facilitating smooth collaboration on projects. It has greatly benefited me in staying connected with my team and ensuring efficient teamwork.
Easy-to-use interface. It makes it effortless for me to stay connected with colleagues and collaborate effectively.
one thing I dislike is that it is not widely used across organizations. Many organizations, including mine, have transitioned to a different software called Teams, which, in my opinion, is not as user-friendly.
I really love the feature that enables me to pass controls from one use to the next. I’m enjoying the experience of using it for nearly all my video calling and meetings. I highly support the use of this software.
Accessing it is simple, the UI is extremely appealing, the client support service is exceptional-incredibly simple and training modules are available, passing the control is possible, calling your phone to join meetings is possible, updates to the software to enhance and offer patches are continuous, it is greatly secured and the ability to schedule meetings is easy.
The audio connections is at times problematic.
The ideal software with complete functionality.
The first learning timeline can be misleading if you’re not conversant with the layout of CUCM.
Solves the crucial problems of maintaining communication during lockdown and facilitating smooth collaboration on projects. It has greatly benefited me in staying connected with my team and ensuring efficient teamwork.
Easy-to-use interface. It makes it effortless for me to stay connected with colleagues and collaborate effectively.
one thing I dislike is that it is not widely used across organizations. Many organizations, including mine, have transitioned to a different software called Teams, which, in my opinion, is not as user-friendly.
Solves the crucial problems of maintaining communication during lockdown and facilitating smooth collaboration on projects. It has greatly benefited me in staying connected with my team and ensuring efficient teamwork.
Easy-to-use interface. It makes it effortless for me to stay connected with colleagues and collaborate effectively.
one thing I dislike is that it is not widely used across organizations. Many organizations, including mine, have transitioned to a different software called Teams, which, in my opinion, is not as user-friendly.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Cisco Webex vs. MiTeam Meetings, Cisco Webex has 334 user reviews and MiTeam Meetings has 15. The average star rating for Cisco Webex is 4.35 while MiTeam Meetings has an average rating of 4.2. Cisco Webex has more positive reviews than MiTeam Meetings. Comparing Cisco Webex vs. MiTeam Meetings reviews, Cisco Webex has stronger overall reviews.
Cisco Webex vs. MiTeam Meetings both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Conferencing Capabilities, Presenter Controls, Remote Support Features, Chat/IM Management, Phone System Features, Call Management & Administration, Reporting & Analytics, Collaboration Tools, File Management, Language & Speech, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Supported Channels. In our feature comparison of Cisco Webex vs. MiTeam Meetings, MiTeam Meetings offers more of the most popular features and tools than Cisco Webex.
In our pricing comparison of Cisco Webex vs. MiTeam Meetings, MiTeam Meetings's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to MiTeam Meetings's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Cisco Webex vs. MiTeam Meetings shows that MiTeam Meetings scores higher in usability for ease of use, ease of admin. Cisco Webex scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, but MiTeam Meetings has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
