In our comparison of Cisco Webex vs. Dialpad Meetings, Dialpad Meetings is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
I really love the feature that enables me to pass controls from one use to the next. I’m enjoying the experience of using it for nearly all my video calling and meetings. I highly support the use of this software.
Accessing it is simple, the UI is extremely appealing, the client support service is exceptional-incredibly simple and training modules are available, passing the control is possible, calling your phone to join meetings is possible, updates to the software to enhance and offer patches are continuous, it is greatly secured and the ability to schedule meetings is easy.
The audio connections is at times problematic.
Connecting with many customers and project teams is simple using UberConference. It is simple to set up a warranted group call, run it without any problems for the most part and take care of the invites too.
My customers don’t have to pay for a subscription as most times the free plan is sufficient for a few of my smaller projects, using phone or computer for audio or calling in through browser or phone is flexible, in case a person is feeding back or making distracting noise, you can mute others on the call, novices can navigate the software with ease as the software is intuitive, well designed, and visually clean, and it is simple to share screens from inside Chrome.
Screen sharing with browsers could be added, for those viewing in browser that must mute themselves, type chat plus audio.
The ideal software with complete functionality.
The first learning timeline can be misleading if you’re not conversant with the layout of CUCM.
Extremely great client service, its design is beautifully done exclusively for screen sharing and audio conferencing purposes. Also, it directly results in an extremely clear voice and high quality high definition crisp, and during screen sharing the picture quality is exceptional.
Any team that wishes to enhance productivity should try the free or paid plans.
You can join the conference call after simply clicking a link, has exceptional screen sharing, persons up to 10 to 11 per call use it at no cost, anyone can mute the other person, you can view and talk/listen through laptop or when viewing the screen share through laptop you can call in through phone.
Lack of support of the screenshare option on Firefox browsers. The options for audio drop down tab don’t appear when connecting through laptop.
I really love the feature that enables me to pass controls from one use to the next. I’m enjoying the experience of using it for nearly all my video calling and meetings. I highly support the use of this software.
Accessing it is simple, the UI is extremely appealing, the client support service is exceptional-incredibly simple and training modules are available, passing the control is possible, calling your phone to join meetings is possible, updates to the software to enhance and offer patches are continuous, it is greatly secured and the ability to schedule meetings is easy.
The audio connections is at times problematic.
The ideal software with complete functionality.
The first learning timeline can be misleading if you’re not conversant with the layout of CUCM.
Connecting with many customers and project teams is simple using UberConference. It is simple to set up a warranted group call, run it without any problems for the most part and take care of the invites too.
My customers don’t have to pay for a subscription as most times the free plan is sufficient for a few of my smaller projects, using phone or computer for audio or calling in through browser or phone is flexible, in case a person is feeding back or making distracting noise, you can mute others on the call, novices can navigate the software with ease as the software is intuitive, well designed, and visually clean, and it is simple to share screens from inside Chrome.
Screen sharing with browsers could be added, for those viewing in browser that must mute themselves, type chat plus audio.
Extremely great client service, its design is beautifully done exclusively for screen sharing and audio conferencing purposes. Also, it directly results in an extremely clear voice and high quality high definition crisp, and during screen sharing the picture quality is exceptional.
Any team that wishes to enhance productivity should try the free or paid plans.
You can join the conference call after simply clicking a link, has exceptional screen sharing, persons up to 10 to 11 per call use it at no cost, anyone can mute the other person, you can view and talk/listen through laptop or when viewing the screen share through laptop you can call in through phone.
Lack of support of the screenshare option on Firefox browsers. The options for audio drop down tab don’t appear when connecting through laptop.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Cisco Webex vs. Dialpad Meetings, Dialpad Meetings has 48 user reviews and Cisco Webex has 334. The average star rating for Dialpad Meetings is 4.52 while Cisco Webex has an average rating of 4.35. Dialpad Meetings has more positive reviews than Cisco Webex. Comparing Cisco Webex vs. Dialpad Meetings reviews, Dialpad Meetings has stronger overall reviews.
Cisco Webex vs. Dialpad Meetings both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Conferencing Capabilities, Remote Support Features, Call Management & Administration, Reporting & Analytics, Recording , Collaboration Tools, Language & Speech, Reminders/Alerts, Enhancements & Personalization, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Cisco Webex vs. Dialpad Meetings, Dialpad Meetings offers more of the most popular features and tools than Cisco Webex.
In our pricing comparison of Cisco Webex vs. Dialpad Meetings, Dialpad Meetings's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Dialpad Meetings's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Cisco Webex vs. Dialpad Meetings shows that Dialpad Meetings scores higher in usability for learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Cisco Webex scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, but Dialpad Meetings has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
