In our comparison of Act! vs. Mediafly, Act! is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
N/A
* Vendor does not share prices.
I am a big fan of all the functions that this program has. It has been helpful to my company and me.
The customer service team is weak. There are also way too many bugs, and its syncing capability is almost non-existent.
IS2 impressively anticipates the questions businesses need answers to and offers ready-made reports and dashboards. The recent addition of automatic activity data ingestion from sales reps enhances the platform's utility.
The low administrative overhead due to their support model sets IS2 apart from similar products. The activity capture feature outperforms SF Inbox.
Like most platforms of this nature, IS2 isn't a plug-and-play solution. Implementing it may reveal discrepancies in your processes that can affect your data quality.
Very disappointed with this program. I’ve been a long-time user of Act! but the experience it gave me over the past year has been awful. I am now looking for other software that can work the same way that Act! did.
I liked its capability to manage contact information, it keeps all the data I need in one place. However, this feature went out of the window when the entire system stopped working. I asked the support for help, but the solution they provided was useless.
The reporting sucks. As for the whole program, it used to work great but not anymore.
One of the best features of IS is its powerful out-of-the-box analytics. Previously, the reviewer used Salesforce for day-to-day reporting, but found that creating custom reports took a lot of time and effort. With IS, it's much easier to analyze data such as the number of calls required to generate a certain amount of revenue or the likelihood of an opportunity closing. This has made the reviewer feel like they were previously driving blind.
One downside of IS is that it requires some configuration and a learning curve for new users. However, the reviewer's sales rep was helpful in ensuring they were set up correctly. Overall, IS has improved the reviewer's day-to-day reporting, forecasting, and deal insight processes, making them smoother and more efficient.
I am a big fan of all the functions that this program has. It has been helpful to my company and me.
The customer service team is weak. There are also way too many bugs, and its syncing capability is almost non-existent.
Very disappointed with this program. I’ve been a long-time user of Act! but the experience it gave me over the past year has been awful. I am now looking for other software that can work the same way that Act! did.
I liked its capability to manage contact information, it keeps all the data I need in one place. However, this feature went out of the window when the entire system stopped working. I asked the support for help, but the solution they provided was useless.
The reporting sucks. As for the whole program, it used to work great but not anymore.
IS2 impressively anticipates the questions businesses need answers to and offers ready-made reports and dashboards. The recent addition of automatic activity data ingestion from sales reps enhances the platform's utility.
The low administrative overhead due to their support model sets IS2 apart from similar products. The activity capture feature outperforms SF Inbox.
Like most platforms of this nature, IS2 isn't a plug-and-play solution. Implementing it may reveal discrepancies in your processes that can affect your data quality.
One of the best features of IS is its powerful out-of-the-box analytics. Previously, the reviewer used Salesforce for day-to-day reporting, but found that creating custom reports took a lot of time and effort. With IS, it's much easier to analyze data such as the number of calls required to generate a certain amount of revenue or the likelihood of an opportunity closing. This has made the reviewer feel like they were previously driving blind.
One downside of IS is that it requires some configuration and a learning curve for new users. However, the reviewer's sales rep was helpful in ensuring they were set up correctly. Overall, IS has improved the reviewer's day-to-day reporting, forecasting, and deal insight processes, making them smoother and more efficient.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Act! vs. Mediafly, Mediafly has 8 user reviews and Act! has 140. The average star rating for Mediafly is 4.62 while Act! has an average rating of 4.05. Mediafly has more positive reviews than Act!. Comparing Act! vs. Mediafly reviews, Mediafly has stronger overall reviews.
Act! vs. Mediafly both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Customer Management, Contact Management, Reporting & Analytics, Call Management & Administration, Inventory Management, Customizable Items, Collaboration Tools, Workflow Automation, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Integration Options, Microsoft 365, Deployment Options. In our feature comparison of Act! vs. Mediafly, Act! offers more of the most popular features and tools than Mediafly.
In our pricing comparison of Act! vs. Mediafly, Mediafly's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Mediafly's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Act! vs. Mediafly shows that Act! scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin. Mediafly scores higher in meets requirements, quality of support, but Act! has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
