In our comparison of SightCall vs. TeamViewer, TeamViewer is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Its visual and auditory communication capabilities, coupled with real-time drawings, annotations, photos, and screen sharing, allow service agents to see and understand problems exactly as I do. This level of precision and clarity ensures that solutions are implemented efficiently, saving significant time and resources. Whether it's sharing screens or files, SightCall provides a comprehensive communication experience that fosters seamless collaboration and accelerates problem-solving processes.
High-quality video calls with real-time audiovisual clarity and excellent graphic speed. Has geolocation, zoom, and on-screen marking. Helpful technical support.
None
It has worked well for the many years I have used it mainly to support people contacting me for tech assistance.
It functions well, it is seamless, and walking a person through the process of giving me one-time access to their computer on the phone is very simple.
It can be initially confusing for users to understand the relation between host and customer programs.
As a company, we require a conference system for conducting events and facilitating communication, both internally and externally. While researching different systems, we came across various collaborative and conference-only tools. However, SightCall stood out as a system that offered much more. It not only allows communication within the company but also enables live technical support for customers. The support we can provide using artificial intelligence is exceptional, as it allows us to efficiently identify and address user issues and failures. This aspect of SightCall is truly remarkable.
SightCall has been incredibly reliable and user-friendly, and this sentiment is shared by both our company and our users. The software's interface is exceptional, making it extremely simple to create web conferences. The system ensures stability throughout the login and conference processes, and I have not encountered any disadvantages. SightCall continues to evolve and improve gradually without any issues.
None
While working from home, I often use TeamViewer for short term remote logins. Setting up an account for all my machines is very simple and without using the temporary passwords provided by default by TeamViewer, one can connect with a unique password once TeamViewer is running in the background.
Using the secure file transfer window, it is simple to transfer files, if many monitors are connected to the remote PC it functions well, switching the active monitors from a remote customer is simple, it doesn’t matter the OS running on the machines on both ends as it is a cross-platform app, accessing all my desktops remotely is simple thanks to TeamViewer, remote computer seems like a seamless experience if both ends are supported by the right internet speed, and you simply need to open TeamViewer from your phone and turn your multi-touch display into a responsive trackpad for the desktop if you’re missing trackpads for your computer.
There are limitations to the free version. It may be a bad idea for a prolonged session of remote login.
Its visual and auditory communication capabilities, coupled with real-time drawings, annotations, photos, and screen sharing, allow service agents to see and understand problems exactly as I do. This level of precision and clarity ensures that solutions are implemented efficiently, saving significant time and resources. Whether it's sharing screens or files, SightCall provides a comprehensive communication experience that fosters seamless collaboration and accelerates problem-solving processes.
High-quality video calls with real-time audiovisual clarity and excellent graphic speed. Has geolocation, zoom, and on-screen marking. Helpful technical support.
None
As a company, we require a conference system for conducting events and facilitating communication, both internally and externally. While researching different systems, we came across various collaborative and conference-only tools. However, SightCall stood out as a system that offered much more. It not only allows communication within the company but also enables live technical support for customers. The support we can provide using artificial intelligence is exceptional, as it allows us to efficiently identify and address user issues and failures. This aspect of SightCall is truly remarkable.
SightCall has been incredibly reliable and user-friendly, and this sentiment is shared by both our company and our users. The software's interface is exceptional, making it extremely simple to create web conferences. The system ensures stability throughout the login and conference processes, and I have not encountered any disadvantages. SightCall continues to evolve and improve gradually without any issues.
None
It has worked well for the many years I have used it mainly to support people contacting me for tech assistance.
It functions well, it is seamless, and walking a person through the process of giving me one-time access to their computer on the phone is very simple.
It can be initially confusing for users to understand the relation between host and customer programs.
While working from home, I often use TeamViewer for short term remote logins. Setting up an account for all my machines is very simple and without using the temporary passwords provided by default by TeamViewer, one can connect with a unique password once TeamViewer is running in the background.
Using the secure file transfer window, it is simple to transfer files, if many monitors are connected to the remote PC it functions well, switching the active monitors from a remote customer is simple, it doesn’t matter the OS running on the machines on both ends as it is a cross-platform app, accessing all my desktops remotely is simple thanks to TeamViewer, remote computer seems like a seamless experience if both ends are supported by the right internet speed, and you simply need to open TeamViewer from your phone and turn your multi-touch display into a responsive trackpad for the desktop if you’re missing trackpads for your computer.
There are limitations to the free version. It may be a bad idea for a prolonged session of remote login.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of SightCall vs. TeamViewer, TeamViewer has 102 user reviews and SightCall has 2. The average star rating for TeamViewer is 4.58 while SightCall has an average rating of 4.5. TeamViewer has more positive reviews than SightCall. Comparing SightCall vs. TeamViewer reviews, TeamViewer has stronger overall reviews.
SightCall vs. TeamViewer both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Remote Support Features, Chat/IM Management, Device Management, Collaboration Tools, Document Management, Reporting & Analytics, Recording , Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Customizable Items, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Cybersecurity Features, Contact Management, Appointments/Scheduling, Limits, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of SightCall vs. TeamViewer, TeamViewer offers more of the most popular features and tools than SightCall.
In our pricing comparison of SightCall vs. TeamViewer, TeamViewer's pricing starts at $24.90/month and is more affordable compared to TeamViewer's starting cost of $24.90/month.
Our comparison of SightCall vs. TeamViewer shows that SightCall scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements. TeamViewer scores higher in learning curve, steup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but SightCall has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
