In our comparison of Oracle Beehive vs. Zoho Meeting, Oracle Beehive is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
Using this SAAS solution has helped us reduce costs associated with accommodating changing customer demands. It not only cuts down expenses but also enhances the overall customer experience."
The ease of use and the comprehensive solution it offers by combining email and team collaboration as a SAAS.
While there are no major issues, there is room for improvement in terms of service.
My use of zoho is only for meetings. I understand how important the quality of sound and video is when you are having an important but distant meeting. While working with other tools I always had some issues. But with Zoho, my experience is quite outstanding.
It is very easy in use and its simple interface facilitates the ease. I will not claim it to be the best but I consider it to be the easiest. The speed with which it gets connected can beat any better software.
I would like to be additional features added.
We are utilizing Beehive as a software-as-a-service solution in the cloud. Its flexibility in usage is a significant advantage. The collaborative features integrated with Outlook are highly beneficial, and the performance surpasses traditional mailing or messaging services."
I appreciate the flexible deployment options and centralized administration provided by Beehive. It also offers seamless integration with various large applications and components, along with instant messaging capabilities. In comparison to Outlook, Beehive stands out as a superior choice.
One drawback is the limited database storage it provides, and the out-of-the-box experience could be improved. I believe the tool could benefit from additional features such as user configurations and increased database storage capacity.
Good fundamental features e.g. screen sharing, invites, calls, etc.
Occasional disconnecting of screen sharing, audio quality is poor at times.
Using this SAAS solution has helped us reduce costs associated with accommodating changing customer demands. It not only cuts down expenses but also enhances the overall customer experience."
The ease of use and the comprehensive solution it offers by combining email and team collaboration as a SAAS.
While there are no major issues, there is room for improvement in terms of service.
We are utilizing Beehive as a software-as-a-service solution in the cloud. Its flexibility in usage is a significant advantage. The collaborative features integrated with Outlook are highly beneficial, and the performance surpasses traditional mailing or messaging services."
I appreciate the flexible deployment options and centralized administration provided by Beehive. It also offers seamless integration with various large applications and components, along with instant messaging capabilities. In comparison to Outlook, Beehive stands out as a superior choice.
One drawback is the limited database storage it provides, and the out-of-the-box experience could be improved. I believe the tool could benefit from additional features such as user configurations and increased database storage capacity.
My use of zoho is only for meetings. I understand how important the quality of sound and video is when you are having an important but distant meeting. While working with other tools I always had some issues. But with Zoho, my experience is quite outstanding.
It is very easy in use and its simple interface facilitates the ease. I will not claim it to be the best but I consider it to be the easiest. The speed with which it gets connected can beat any better software.
I would like to be additional features added.
Good fundamental features e.g. screen sharing, invites, calls, etc.
Occasional disconnecting of screen sharing, audio quality is poor at times.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Oracle Beehive vs. Zoho Meeting, Zoho Meeting has 27 user reviews and Oracle Beehive has 5. The average star rating for Zoho Meeting is 4.70 while Oracle Beehive has an average rating of 4.4. Zoho Meeting has more positive reviews than Oracle Beehive. Comparing Oracle Beehive vs. Zoho Meeting reviews, Zoho Meeting has stronger overall reviews.
Oracle Beehive vs. Zoho Meeting both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Conferencing Capabilities, Presenter Controls, Remote Support Features, Chat/IM Management, Phone System Features, Call Management & Administration, Collaboration Tools, File Management, Customizable Items, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Oracle Beehive vs. Zoho Meeting, Oracle Beehive offers more of the most popular features and tools than Zoho Meeting.
In our pricing comparison of Oracle Beehive vs. Zoho Meeting, Zoho Meeting's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Zoho Meeting's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Oracle Beehive vs. Zoho Meeting shows that Oracle Beehive scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements. Zoho Meeting scores higher in learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but Oracle Beehive has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
