In our comparison of N-able Take Control vs. Pulseway, Pulseway is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
Helps us to make remote connections, and also see who is currently online.
Easy connection to clients and the ability to see who is logged in and their location on our network.
I am currently experiencing an issue where I cannot see chrome screens and some windows screen areas. This problem has occurred on two Windows 10 laptops, one running version 1903 and the other running version 1909. I plan to contact support for assistance.
I've been using this product for many years. I initially used it just to remotely monitor servers. Since then, I've increased my usage of the platform to include monitoring workstations, which has helped improve my ability to manage patch installations for OS and third-party apps. Using the interface has been excellent and dependable as always. It is quite simple to install, configure, and deploy the software.
Easy to deploy, remote management and budget friendly
Limited reporting templates
Take Control gets the job done, but it falls short in some aspects. It is advisable to use an additional form of communication alongside this client, and the user interface could be more user-friendly.
Take Control offers a quick and stable remote connection, and the alert for incoming connections in the form of a pop-up window at the center of the screen is highly convenient for receiving prompt assistance.
The chat function in Take Control has several drawbacks. The UI is unattractive, and there is no option to initiate a chat on your own. You can only start chatting after receiving a message from support, and the buttons for showing/hiding the chat are not easily visible.
I've been using this product for many years. I initially used it just to remotely monitor servers. Since then, I've increased my usage of the platform to include monitoring workstations, which has helped improve my ability to manage patch installations for OS and third-party apps. Using the interface has been excellent and dependable as always. It is quite simple to install, configure, and deploy the software.
Easy to deploy, remote management and budget friendly
Limited reporting templates
Helps us to make remote connections, and also see who is currently online.
Easy connection to clients and the ability to see who is logged in and their location on our network.
I am currently experiencing an issue where I cannot see chrome screens and some windows screen areas. This problem has occurred on two Windows 10 laptops, one running version 1903 and the other running version 1909. I plan to contact support for assistance.
Take Control gets the job done, but it falls short in some aspects. It is advisable to use an additional form of communication alongside this client, and the user interface could be more user-friendly.
Take Control offers a quick and stable remote connection, and the alert for incoming connections in the form of a pop-up window at the center of the screen is highly convenient for receiving prompt assistance.
The chat function in Take Control has several drawbacks. The UI is unattractive, and there is no option to initiate a chat on your own. You can only start chatting after receiving a message from support, and the buttons for showing/hiding the chat are not easily visible.
I've been using this product for many years. I initially used it just to remotely monitor servers. Since then, I've increased my usage of the platform to include monitoring workstations, which has helped improve my ability to manage patch installations for OS and third-party apps. Using the interface has been excellent and dependable as always. It is quite simple to install, configure, and deploy the software.
Easy to deploy, remote management and budget friendly
Limited reporting templates
I've been using this product for many years. I initially used it just to remotely monitor servers. Since then, I've increased my usage of the platform to include monitoring workstations, which has helped improve my ability to manage patch installations for OS and third-party apps. Using the interface has been excellent and dependable as always. It is quite simple to install, configure, and deploy the software.
Easy to deploy, remote management and budget friendly
Limited reporting templates
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of N-able Take Control vs. Pulseway, Pulseway has 38 user reviews and N-able Take Control has 8. The average star rating for Pulseway is 4.71 while N-able Take Control has an average rating of 4.5. Pulseway has more positive reviews than N-able Take Control. Comparing N-able Take Control vs. Pulseway reviews, Pulseway has stronger overall reviews.
N-able Take Control vs. Pulseway both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Remote Support Features, Conferencing Capabilities, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Reporting & Analytics, Recording , Compliance Accreditations, Chat/IM Management, Device Management, Collaboration Tools, File Management, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Report Management, Language & Speech, Customizable Items, Cybersecurity Features, Reminders/Alerts, Appointments/Scheduling, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of N-able Take Control vs. Pulseway, N-able Take Control offers more of the most popular features and tools than Pulseway.
In our pricing comparison of N-able Take Control vs. Pulseway, Pulseway's pricing starts at $22/month and is more affordable compared to N-able Take Control's starting cost of $25.5/month.
Our comparison of N-able Take Control vs. Pulseway shows that N-able Take Control scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, quality of support. Pulseway scores higher in learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin, but N-able Take Control has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
