In our comparison of Microsoft Teams vs. Oracle Beehive, Oracle Beehive is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
N/A
* Vendor does not share prices.
Especially in the pandemic era, this tool has been instrumental in saving time during meetings. Its efficient document sharing and navigation features have contributed significantly to our workflow.
The ease of navigation and document sharing capabilities are the standout features for me.
On occasion, there's a delay in receiving messages from colleagues when I'm offline.
Using this SAAS solution has helped us reduce costs associated with accommodating changing customer demands. It not only cuts down expenses but also enhances the overall customer experience."
The ease of use and the comprehensive solution it offers by combining email and team collaboration as a SAAS.
While there are no major issues, there is room for improvement in terms of service.
This platform provides an efficient and user-friendly communication solution. While the awards feature could be refined, the overall experience is commendable, making it a standout choice.
The ability to edit or delete sent chat messages is a practical feature. Direct calling and mention tags add to the convenience. Plus, the support for GIFs injects a fun element into workplace communication.
The awards feature could be more useful or integrated with other functions to enhance its value.
We are utilizing Beehive as a software-as-a-service solution in the cloud. Its flexibility in usage is a significant advantage. The collaborative features integrated with Outlook are highly beneficial, and the performance surpasses traditional mailing or messaging services."
I appreciate the flexible deployment options and centralized administration provided by Beehive. It also offers seamless integration with various large applications and components, along with instant messaging capabilities. In comparison to Outlook, Beehive stands out as a superior choice.
One drawback is the limited database storage it provides, and the out-of-the-box experience could be improved. I believe the tool could benefit from additional features such as user configurations and increased database storage capacity.
Especially in the pandemic era, this tool has been instrumental in saving time during meetings. Its efficient document sharing and navigation features have contributed significantly to our workflow.
The ease of navigation and document sharing capabilities are the standout features for me.
On occasion, there's a delay in receiving messages from colleagues when I'm offline.
This platform provides an efficient and user-friendly communication solution. While the awards feature could be refined, the overall experience is commendable, making it a standout choice.
The ability to edit or delete sent chat messages is a practical feature. Direct calling and mention tags add to the convenience. Plus, the support for GIFs injects a fun element into workplace communication.
The awards feature could be more useful or integrated with other functions to enhance its value.
Using this SAAS solution has helped us reduce costs associated with accommodating changing customer demands. It not only cuts down expenses but also enhances the overall customer experience."
The ease of use and the comprehensive solution it offers by combining email and team collaboration as a SAAS.
While there are no major issues, there is room for improvement in terms of service.
We are utilizing Beehive as a software-as-a-service solution in the cloud. Its flexibility in usage is a significant advantage. The collaborative features integrated with Outlook are highly beneficial, and the performance surpasses traditional mailing or messaging services."
I appreciate the flexible deployment options and centralized administration provided by Beehive. It also offers seamless integration with various large applications and components, along with instant messaging capabilities. In comparison to Outlook, Beehive stands out as a superior choice.
One drawback is the limited database storage it provides, and the out-of-the-box experience could be improved. I believe the tool could benefit from additional features such as user configurations and increased database storage capacity.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Microsoft Teams vs. Oracle Beehive, Microsoft Teams has 9 user reviews and Oracle Beehive has 5. The average star rating for Microsoft Teams is 4.88 while Oracle Beehive has an average rating of 4.4. Microsoft Teams has more positive reviews than Oracle Beehive. Comparing Microsoft Teams vs. Oracle Beehive reviews, Microsoft Teams has stronger overall reviews.
Microsoft Teams vs. Oracle Beehive both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Conferencing Capabilities, Presenter Controls, Remote Support Features, Chat/IM Management, Phone System Features, Call Management & Administration, Collaboration Tools, File Management, Customizable Items, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Microsoft Teams vs. Oracle Beehive, Oracle Beehive offers more of the most popular features and tools than Microsoft Teams.
In our pricing comparison of Microsoft Teams vs. Oracle Beehive, Oracle Beehive's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Oracle Beehive's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Microsoft Teams vs. Oracle Beehive shows that Oracle Beehive scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, ease of admin. Microsoft Teams scores higher in learning curve, setup & support, but Oracle Beehive has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
