In our comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. Microsoft Teams, Dialpad Meetings is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
N/A
N/A
Connecting with many customers and project teams is simple using UberConference. It is simple to set up a warranted group call, run it without any problems for the most part and take care of the invites too.
My customers don’t have to pay for a subscription as most times the free plan is sufficient for a few of my smaller projects, using phone or computer for audio or calling in through browser or phone is flexible, in case a person is feeding back or making distracting noise, you can mute others on the call, novices can navigate the software with ease as the software is intuitive, well designed, and visually clean, and it is simple to share screens from inside Chrome.
Screen sharing with browsers could be added, for those viewing in browser that must mute themselves, type chat plus audio.
Especially in the pandemic era, this tool has been instrumental in saving time during meetings. Its efficient document sharing and navigation features have contributed significantly to our workflow.
The ease of navigation and document sharing capabilities are the standout features for me.
On occasion, there's a delay in receiving messages from colleagues when I'm offline.
Extremely great client service, its design is beautifully done exclusively for screen sharing and audio conferencing purposes. Also, it directly results in an extremely clear voice and high quality high definition crisp, and during screen sharing the picture quality is exceptional.
Any team that wishes to enhance productivity should try the free or paid plans.
You can join the conference call after simply clicking a link, has exceptional screen sharing, persons up to 10 to 11 per call use it at no cost, anyone can mute the other person, you can view and talk/listen through laptop or when viewing the screen share through laptop you can call in through phone.
Lack of support of the screenshare option on Firefox browsers. The options for audio drop down tab don’t appear when connecting through laptop.
This platform provides an efficient and user-friendly communication solution. While the awards feature could be refined, the overall experience is commendable, making it a standout choice.
The ability to edit or delete sent chat messages is a practical feature. Direct calling and mention tags add to the convenience. Plus, the support for GIFs injects a fun element into workplace communication.
The awards feature could be more useful or integrated with other functions to enhance its value.
Connecting with many customers and project teams is simple using UberConference. It is simple to set up a warranted group call, run it without any problems for the most part and take care of the invites too.
My customers don’t have to pay for a subscription as most times the free plan is sufficient for a few of my smaller projects, using phone or computer for audio or calling in through browser or phone is flexible, in case a person is feeding back or making distracting noise, you can mute others on the call, novices can navigate the software with ease as the software is intuitive, well designed, and visually clean, and it is simple to share screens from inside Chrome.
Screen sharing with browsers could be added, for those viewing in browser that must mute themselves, type chat plus audio.
Extremely great client service, its design is beautifully done exclusively for screen sharing and audio conferencing purposes. Also, it directly results in an extremely clear voice and high quality high definition crisp, and during screen sharing the picture quality is exceptional.
Any team that wishes to enhance productivity should try the free or paid plans.
You can join the conference call after simply clicking a link, has exceptional screen sharing, persons up to 10 to 11 per call use it at no cost, anyone can mute the other person, you can view and talk/listen through laptop or when viewing the screen share through laptop you can call in through phone.
Lack of support of the screenshare option on Firefox browsers. The options for audio drop down tab don’t appear when connecting through laptop.
Especially in the pandemic era, this tool has been instrumental in saving time during meetings. Its efficient document sharing and navigation features have contributed significantly to our workflow.
The ease of navigation and document sharing capabilities are the standout features for me.
On occasion, there's a delay in receiving messages from colleagues when I'm offline.
This platform provides an efficient and user-friendly communication solution. While the awards feature could be refined, the overall experience is commendable, making it a standout choice.
The ability to edit or delete sent chat messages is a practical feature. Direct calling and mention tags add to the convenience. Plus, the support for GIFs injects a fun element into workplace communication.
The awards feature could be more useful or integrated with other functions to enhance its value.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. Microsoft Teams, Microsoft Teams has 9 user reviews and Dialpad Meetings has 48. The average star rating for Microsoft Teams is 4.88 while Dialpad Meetings has an average rating of 4.52. Microsoft Teams has more positive reviews than Dialpad Meetings. Comparing Dialpad Meetings vs. Microsoft Teams reviews, Microsoft Teams has stronger overall reviews.
Dialpad Meetings vs. Microsoft Teams both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Conferencing Capabilities, Remote Support Features, Call Management & Administration, Collaboration Tools, Language & Speech, Reminders/Alerts, Enhancements & Personalization, Reporting & Analytics, Recording , Identity and Access Management (IAM), Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. Microsoft Teams, Dialpad Meetings offers more of the most popular features and tools than Microsoft Teams.
In our pricing comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. Microsoft Teams, Microsoft Teams's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Microsoft Teams's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. Microsoft Teams shows that Microsoft Teams scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve. Dialpad Meetings scores higher in setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but Microsoft Teams has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
