Dialpad Meetings vs. HighFive Video Conferencing: Which is Best?

Connecting with many customers and project teams is simple using UberConference. It is simple to set up a warranted group call, run it without any problems for the most part and take care of the invites too.

My customers don’t have to pay for a subscription as most times the free plan is sufficient for a few of my smaller projects, using phone or computer for audio or calling in through browser or phone is flexible, in case a person is feeding back or making distracting noise, you can mute others on the call, novices can navigate the software with ease as the software is intuitive, well designed, and visually clean, and it is simple to share screens from inside Chrome.

Screen sharing with browsers could be added, for those viewing in browser that must mute themselves, type chat plus audio.

Extremely great client service, its design is beautifully done exclusively for screen sharing and audio conferencing purposes. Also, it directly results in an extremely clear voice and high quality high definition crisp, and during screen sharing the picture quality is exceptional.

Any team that wishes to enhance productivity should try the free or paid plans.

You can join the conference call after simply clicking a link, has exceptional screen sharing, persons up to 10 to 11 per call use it at no cost, anyone can mute the other person, you can view and talk/listen through laptop or when viewing the screen share through laptop you can call in through phone.

Lack of support of the screenshare option on Firefox browsers. The options for audio drop down tab don’t appear when connecting through laptop.

The standout feature of cloud storage for recorded conferences adds significant value, enhancing the overall utility and efficiency of the platform. For users considering Zoom, it's crucial to evaluate the size of the groups involved in video conferences. Understanding the performance limitations with a larger number of participants can help in making an informed decision.

Zoom excels in providing a tool for conducting dynamic and high-definition videoconferences with excellent audio quality.

Zoom does have a limitation when it comes to larger groups, and when more than 90 people connect, performance tends to slow down significantly. Issues such as audio or video pausing and, at times, losing the entire video conference can occur, impacting the overall effectiveness of the platform.

Highfive assists us to link with many remote staff and offers face to face communication and screen sharing ability. It is simple to begin feeling detached from one another seeing that our department is divided across to offices one on each coast. This software is used to aid close the gap offering us the capability to effortlessly have a combined team meeting between the two offices in our respective conference halls. Its use of screen of sharing aids us in managing to offer a simple method to fast go via PowerPoint presentations or show the team how to achieve a certain workflow.

Excellent for linking with remote staff and offering face to face conversations and screen sharing ability, ideal for corporations with numerous offices, or staff out in the field, it’s helpful even if you don’t have remote reps, the software’s sharing capabilities offer a simple method to fast walk via PowerPoint presentations or even illustrate to the team how to attain a certain workflow, and its suitable for duping your staff when they least anticipate it.

The software occasionally lags or functions slowly if you or a participant of yours in the meeting has slow internet and you can be duped by you fellow staff.