In our comparison of Blue Jeans vs. Dialpad Meetings, Dialpad Meetings is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
The audio and video quality calls are incredibly effective, the naturally existing gap in communication between the offshore and full time designers has been eased by this software, and collaboration with the offshore group is possible courtesy of BlueJeans.
The bandwidth consumed by BlueJeans exceeds the normal consumption.
Connecting with many customers and project teams is simple using UberConference. It is simple to set up a warranted group call, run it without any problems for the most part and take care of the invites too.
My customers don’t have to pay for a subscription as most times the free plan is sufficient for a few of my smaller projects, using phone or computer for audio or calling in through browser or phone is flexible, in case a person is feeding back or making distracting noise, you can mute others on the call, novices can navigate the software with ease as the software is intuitive, well designed, and visually clean, and it is simple to share screens from inside Chrome.
Screen sharing with browsers could be added, for those viewing in browser that must mute themselves, type chat plus audio.
When installing platforms and servers for our clients, we communicate with 30 of them (disparate) every month. Also, every day, we use it with our infrastructure team.
Smooth presentations, exceptional quality of audio and video,
Extremely slow and inaccurate remote control, the platform at times requests you to setup the software making people get puzzled yet the web interface is quite faulty.
Extremely great client service, its design is beautifully done exclusively for screen sharing and audio conferencing purposes. Also, it directly results in an extremely clear voice and high quality high definition crisp, and during screen sharing the picture quality is exceptional.
Any team that wishes to enhance productivity should try the free or paid plans.
You can join the conference call after simply clicking a link, has exceptional screen sharing, persons up to 10 to 11 per call use it at no cost, anyone can mute the other person, you can view and talk/listen through laptop or when viewing the screen share through laptop you can call in through phone.
Lack of support of the screenshare option on Firefox browsers. The options for audio drop down tab don’t appear when connecting through laptop.
The audio and video quality calls are incredibly effective, the naturally existing gap in communication between the offshore and full time designers has been eased by this software, and collaboration with the offshore group is possible courtesy of BlueJeans.
The bandwidth consumed by BlueJeans exceeds the normal consumption.
When installing platforms and servers for our clients, we communicate with 30 of them (disparate) every month. Also, every day, we use it with our infrastructure team.
Smooth presentations, exceptional quality of audio and video,
Extremely slow and inaccurate remote control, the platform at times requests you to setup the software making people get puzzled yet the web interface is quite faulty.
Connecting with many customers and project teams is simple using UberConference. It is simple to set up a warranted group call, run it without any problems for the most part and take care of the invites too.
My customers don’t have to pay for a subscription as most times the free plan is sufficient for a few of my smaller projects, using phone or computer for audio or calling in through browser or phone is flexible, in case a person is feeding back or making distracting noise, you can mute others on the call, novices can navigate the software with ease as the software is intuitive, well designed, and visually clean, and it is simple to share screens from inside Chrome.
Screen sharing with browsers could be added, for those viewing in browser that must mute themselves, type chat plus audio.
Extremely great client service, its design is beautifully done exclusively for screen sharing and audio conferencing purposes. Also, it directly results in an extremely clear voice and high quality high definition crisp, and during screen sharing the picture quality is exceptional.
Any team that wishes to enhance productivity should try the free or paid plans.
You can join the conference call after simply clicking a link, has exceptional screen sharing, persons up to 10 to 11 per call use it at no cost, anyone can mute the other person, you can view and talk/listen through laptop or when viewing the screen share through laptop you can call in through phone.
Lack of support of the screenshare option on Firefox browsers. The options for audio drop down tab don’t appear when connecting through laptop.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Blue Jeans vs. Dialpad Meetings, Dialpad Meetings has 48 user reviews and Blue Jeans has 36. The average star rating for Dialpad Meetings is 4.52 while Blue Jeans has an average rating of 4.33. Dialpad Meetings has more positive reviews than Blue Jeans. Comparing Blue Jeans vs. Dialpad Meetings reviews, Dialpad Meetings has stronger overall reviews.
Blue Jeans vs. Dialpad Meetings both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Conferencing Capabilities, Remote Support Features, Call Management & Administration, Collaboration Tools, Language & Speech, Reminders/Alerts, Enhancements & Personalization, Reporting & Analytics, Recording , Identity and Access Management (IAM), Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Blue Jeans vs. Dialpad Meetings, Dialpad Meetings offers more of the most popular features and tools than Blue Jeans.
In our pricing comparison of Blue Jeans vs. Dialpad Meetings, Dialpad Meetings's pricing starts at Free/month and is more affordable compared to Dialpad Meetings's starting cost of Free/month.
Our comparison of Blue Jeans vs. Dialpad Meetings shows that Blue Jeans scores higher in usability for quality of support. Dialpad Meetings scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin, but Blue Jeans has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
