In our comparison of Alfresco vs. OnBase, Alfresco is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The product excels in managing a vast archive of documents spanning over 25 years. It significantly simplifies document approval processes, facilitates records conversion, and enables efficient archival of older documents.
Effective Document Workflow Functionality. User-Friendly Document Metadata Management. Developer and End-User Friendly Interface
Increasing Complexity of Local Installation Post-Version 5.1.1.4. Customization Deployment Challenges in Alfresco
This software is very easy to use and its user interface is very good. Backup feature for all transactions such as invoice generated or sale purchase orders are very useful. Electronic documentation becomes easy with this software.
This software is expensive but it is worth the money.
It has great customization features, it is compatible with multiple types of files, work flow options are great, it is easy to search for documents, the ability to customize your summary of that project, offering visuals to members thanks to the setting of the dashboard on every site, and the ability to know if the project is website based courtesy of the live browser frame.
The interface could be better, unlocking all the functionality and features available to you takes the usability some time.
This software was best when compared to all others that were available. It was very easy to search and store documents because of its flexibility and the support was also excellent.
The support is excellent and the team goes out of the way to help us. The product is so flexible that it can be adapted to many document situations.
It needs time to learn this software from the customer and administrative point of view. Product documentation was sometimes confusing or did not provide complete details.
The product excels in managing a vast archive of documents spanning over 25 years. It significantly simplifies document approval processes, facilitates records conversion, and enables efficient archival of older documents.
Effective Document Workflow Functionality. User-Friendly Document Metadata Management. Developer and End-User Friendly Interface
Increasing Complexity of Local Installation Post-Version 5.1.1.4. Customization Deployment Challenges in Alfresco
It has great customization features, it is compatible with multiple types of files, work flow options are great, it is easy to search for documents, the ability to customize your summary of that project, offering visuals to members thanks to the setting of the dashboard on every site, and the ability to know if the project is website based courtesy of the live browser frame.
The interface could be better, unlocking all the functionality and features available to you takes the usability some time.
This software is very easy to use and its user interface is very good. Backup feature for all transactions such as invoice generated or sale purchase orders are very useful. Electronic documentation becomes easy with this software.
This software is expensive but it is worth the money.
This software was best when compared to all others that were available. It was very easy to search and store documents because of its flexibility and the support was also excellent.
The support is excellent and the team goes out of the way to help us. The product is so flexible that it can be adapted to many document situations.
It needs time to learn this software from the customer and administrative point of view. Product documentation was sometimes confusing or did not provide complete details.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Alfresco vs. OnBase, OnBase has 32 user reviews and Alfresco has 13. The average star rating for OnBase is 4.5 while Alfresco has an average rating of 4.38. OnBase has more positive reviews than Alfresco. Comparing Alfresco vs. OnBase reviews, OnBase has stronger overall reviews.
Alfresco vs. OnBase both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management System (CMS) Features, Document Management, Supported File Formats, Signature Management, Data Management, Supported Content Types, Search Tools, Collaboration Tools, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365. In our feature comparison of Alfresco vs. OnBase, Alfresco offers more of the most popular features and tools than OnBase.
In our pricing comparison of Alfresco vs. OnBase, OnBase's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to OnBase's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Alfresco vs. OnBase shows that Alfresco scores higher in usability for learning curve, ease of admin. OnBase scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, but Alfresco has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
