In our comparison of WebPT vs. eClinicalWorks, eClinicalWorks is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
WebPT is used by speech-language pathologists, occupational practitioners, and physiotherapists. It is accessible from anywhere using any internet-connected device, making it simple to take notes and record patient progress. Additionally incredibly user-friendly and simple to use is WebPT. Both readers and therapists will find the arrangement to be comfortable and helpful. Additionally, the program provides strong billing and insurance tools that make it simple to submit claims and keep track of payments. Users complain that WebPT prevents them from simultaneously using two devices. If your clinic has several PCs, this may be difficult.
Available on any device with internet, user friendly, ergonomic layout and streamlines note writing
No way to be notified of incomplete fields and same user on two devices at once is not possible
It is adaptable, dependable, using it is simple, it has additional features, and client support is good
Very expensive.
I can access my patients' medical records using this software from anywhere in the globe, and it gives me access to real-time data, past results, and therapy administration. I have easy access to their medical history and can even visit their residences. For providing individualized treatment, the application's capacity to be accessed from my own devices outside of the workplace is crucial. But since I can't access a local database, I have to rely on internet access, which makes it challenging to contact patients who live far away. It can also be annoying to deal with the intricate and initially difficult graphical interface.
Accessibility, excellent data transfer rates,flexibility
Internet dependence, complex interface, mobile version limitations
By the time of going live, plenty of installation work remained forcing us to postpone the process by two months. After going live and using it for one year, most of our patients leave as it is full of bugs. Overall, the experience of patients has become very confusing and horrible. It is full of incorrect reminders and its portal is glitched. Investing in this software will cost you your money and patients.
It has many useful features, and if everything really functioned well, it would be extremely simple and customizable to use.
Terrible support-extremely slow response. Bugs are all over the software and very minimal processes (if any) were thought through.
WebPT is used by speech-language pathologists, occupational practitioners, and physiotherapists. It is accessible from anywhere using any internet-connected device, making it simple to take notes and record patient progress. Additionally incredibly user-friendly and simple to use is WebPT. Both readers and therapists will find the arrangement to be comfortable and helpful. Additionally, the program provides strong billing and insurance tools that make it simple to submit claims and keep track of payments. Users complain that WebPT prevents them from simultaneously using two devices. If your clinic has several PCs, this may be difficult.
Available on any device with internet, user friendly, ergonomic layout and streamlines note writing
No way to be notified of incomplete fields and same user on two devices at once is not possible
I can access my patients' medical records using this software from anywhere in the globe, and it gives me access to real-time data, past results, and therapy administration. I have easy access to their medical history and can even visit their residences. For providing individualized treatment, the application's capacity to be accessed from my own devices outside of the workplace is crucial. But since I can't access a local database, I have to rely on internet access, which makes it challenging to contact patients who live far away. It can also be annoying to deal with the intricate and initially difficult graphical interface.
Accessibility, excellent data transfer rates,flexibility
Internet dependence, complex interface, mobile version limitations
It is adaptable, dependable, using it is simple, it has additional features, and client support is good
Very expensive.
By the time of going live, plenty of installation work remained forcing us to postpone the process by two months. After going live and using it for one year, most of our patients leave as it is full of bugs. Overall, the experience of patients has become very confusing and horrible. It is full of incorrect reminders and its portal is glitched. Investing in this software will cost you your money and patients.
It has many useful features, and if everything really functioned well, it would be extremely simple and customizable to use.
Terrible support-extremely slow response. Bugs are all over the software and very minimal processes (if any) were thought through.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of WebPT vs. eClinicalWorks, WebPT has 18 user reviews and eClinicalWorks has 69. The average star rating for WebPT is 4 while eClinicalWorks has an average rating of 3.40. WebPT has more positive reviews than eClinicalWorks. Comparing WebPT vs. eClinicalWorks reviews, WebPT has stronger overall reviews.
WebPT vs. eClinicalWorks both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Medical Practice Management Features, Patient Management, eRX, Medical Charting, Insurance Claim Management, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Portal Types, Language & Speech, Collaboration Tools, File Management, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Reporting & Analytics, Sync/Refresh, Disaster Recovery, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of WebPT vs. eClinicalWorks, eClinicalWorks offers more of the most popular features and tools than WebPT.
In our pricing comparison of WebPT vs. eClinicalWorks, WebPT's pricing starts at $3/month and is more affordable compared to eClinicalWorks's starting cost of $499/month.
Our comparison of WebPT vs. eClinicalWorks shows that eClinicalWorks scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. WebPT scores higher in learning curve, but eClinicalWorks has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
