In our comparison of Praxis vs. athenaClinicals, Praxis is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
As a psychiatrist, having an EMR that doesn't disrupt my patient interactions and enables me to complete notes promptly is essential, and Praxis delivers on these fronts.
Unlike other EMRs I've encountered, Praxis offers an open template that allows me to create notes in my own unique way, rather than relying on rigid drop-down menus and checkboxes.
I primarily use it for my specialty, so I may not be leveraging all its capabilities.
Clinicals has significantly improved our ability to navigate patient charts and doctor's notes, simplifying our daily tasks and enhancing patient communication.
Streamlining the management of patient charts and information, offering a stress-free and efficient platform for communication with patients.
None
EMR’s interface is straightforward. Installing it as you desire needs some time since it has lesser templates. Hopefully, upgrades and enhancements continue.
Simple to learn and follow, very well-arranged, has amazing features, it is quite easy to chart, and its UI is neat and straightforward.
Familiarizing with the system took a while- some features are poorly arranged, compared to bigger EMRs the adjustments and upgrades are a bit less, and installing every template was time consuming as note templates aren’t widespread.
For medical practices with licensed MDs, LCSWs, LMHCs, LCACs, and LMFTs, Athena is a game-changer. Its efficiency in managing diagnoses, allergies, medications, and appointments makes it a top recommendation, especially for practices that incorporate behavioral health and mental health services.
User-friendly system, ensuring a seamless transition to the next steps in our medical practice. The layout is intuitive, making it easy to access crucial information such as diagnoses, allergies, medications, and appointments.
Inability to integrate with our non-licensed practitioners.
As a psychiatrist, having an EMR that doesn't disrupt my patient interactions and enables me to complete notes promptly is essential, and Praxis delivers on these fronts.
Unlike other EMRs I've encountered, Praxis offers an open template that allows me to create notes in my own unique way, rather than relying on rigid drop-down menus and checkboxes.
I primarily use it for my specialty, so I may not be leveraging all its capabilities.
EMR’s interface is straightforward. Installing it as you desire needs some time since it has lesser templates. Hopefully, upgrades and enhancements continue.
Simple to learn and follow, very well-arranged, has amazing features, it is quite easy to chart, and its UI is neat and straightforward.
Familiarizing with the system took a while- some features are poorly arranged, compared to bigger EMRs the adjustments and upgrades are a bit less, and installing every template was time consuming as note templates aren’t widespread.
Clinicals has significantly improved our ability to navigate patient charts and doctor's notes, simplifying our daily tasks and enhancing patient communication.
Streamlining the management of patient charts and information, offering a stress-free and efficient platform for communication with patients.
None
For medical practices with licensed MDs, LCSWs, LMHCs, LCACs, and LMFTs, Athena is a game-changer. Its efficiency in managing diagnoses, allergies, medications, and appointments makes it a top recommendation, especially for practices that incorporate behavioral health and mental health services.
User-friendly system, ensuring a seamless transition to the next steps in our medical practice. The layout is intuitive, making it easy to access crucial information such as diagnoses, allergies, medications, and appointments.
Inability to integrate with our non-licensed practitioners.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Praxis vs. athenaClinicals, Praxis has 33 user reviews and athenaClinicals has 8. The average star rating for Praxis is 5 while athenaClinicals has an average rating of 4.25. Praxis has more positive reviews than athenaClinicals. Comparing Praxis vs. athenaClinicals reviews, Praxis has stronger overall reviews.
Praxis vs. athenaClinicals both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Medical Practice Management Features, Patient Management, eRX, Medical Charting, Laboratory Management, Insurance Claim Management, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Portal Types, Customizable Items, File Management, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Medical Specialties. In our feature comparison of Praxis vs. athenaClinicals, Praxis offers more of the most popular features and tools than athenaClinicals.
In our pricing comparison of Praxis vs. athenaClinicals, athenaClinicals's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to athenaClinicals's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Praxis vs. athenaClinicals shows that Praxis scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, quality of support, ease of admin. athenaClinicals scores higher in learning curve, but Praxis has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
