In our comparison of Greenhouse vs. JazzHR, JazzHR is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
The candidates can be chosen and interviewed taken into consideration through a variety of platforms. The scheduling, knowing the availability, integration, sourcing, interviewing, and flow of the information is very handy and spontaneous. The Candidates’ resumes can be downloaded from other sites.
You need to learn a bit before starting using it. I am still in the learning process. A little more support from the helpdesk will be appreciated.
Using JazzHR has been helpful so far, they also are very eager at answering questions when we encountered issues.
JazzHR is a trustworthy system. Its ease of use and the ability to communicate with your team using the chat-like feature makes it the perfect formula for an ideal workflow. It might not sound that great, but communication is one of the most critical elements for a small HR team.
A mobile app would make it more convenient. I heard that there would be a feature that gives you options for access levels in future updates; it would be a great and helpful addition.
The only edge it has against its competitors is the customer chat, which is surprisingly good. They can overtake their competitors if they know the needs of their customers.
The user interface is easy to navigate.
Some beneficial features are available in other software that would have been great here.
JazzHR has helped us improve our ability to track and manage applicants and create a consistent experience about the candidate through the entire process.
It has the features and functionality of many bigger and expensive options available with added advantage of affordable prices for smaller companies. The careers page, candidate texting and unlimited users with commitment every month were the main attractions for us as our company was new to using an ATS and did not want a long term commitment for the time being.
The major con right now is the reports which are not easy to navigate. It is also a fact that we have not learnt much about it yet and still use customized reports to get the information required. I don't find any other con as such so far.
The candidates can be chosen and interviewed taken into consideration through a variety of platforms. The scheduling, knowing the availability, integration, sourcing, interviewing, and flow of the information is very handy and spontaneous. The Candidates’ resumes can be downloaded from other sites.
You need to learn a bit before starting using it. I am still in the learning process. A little more support from the helpdesk will be appreciated.
The only edge it has against its competitors is the customer chat, which is surprisingly good. They can overtake their competitors if they know the needs of their customers.
The user interface is easy to navigate.
Some beneficial features are available in other software that would have been great here.
Using JazzHR has been helpful so far, they also are very eager at answering questions when we encountered issues.
JazzHR is a trustworthy system. Its ease of use and the ability to communicate with your team using the chat-like feature makes it the perfect formula for an ideal workflow. It might not sound that great, but communication is one of the most critical elements for a small HR team.
A mobile app would make it more convenient. I heard that there would be a feature that gives you options for access levels in future updates; it would be a great and helpful addition.
JazzHR has helped us improve our ability to track and manage applicants and create a consistent experience about the candidate through the entire process.
It has the features and functionality of many bigger and expensive options available with added advantage of affordable prices for smaller companies. The careers page, candidate texting and unlimited users with commitment every month were the main attractions for us as our company was new to using an ATS and did not want a long term commitment for the time being.
The major con right now is the reports which are not easy to navigate. It is also a fact that we have not learnt much about it yet and still use customized reports to get the information required. I don't find any other con as such so far.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Greenhouse vs. JazzHR, Greenhouse has 73 user reviews and JazzHR has 107. The average star rating for Greenhouse is 4.54 while JazzHR has an average rating of 4.41. Greenhouse has more positive reviews than JazzHR. Comparing Greenhouse vs. JazzHR reviews, Greenhouse has stronger overall reviews.
Greenhouse vs. JazzHR both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Talent Management , Human Resources (HR) Features, Supported Channels, Customizable Items, Portal Types, File Management, Signature Management, Reminders/Alerts, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Greenhouse vs. JazzHR, JazzHR offers more of the most popular features and tools than Greenhouse.
In our pricing comparison of Greenhouse vs. JazzHR, JazzHR's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to JazzHR's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Greenhouse vs. JazzHR shows that JazzHR scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, quality of support, ease of admin. Greenhouse scores higher in learning curve, setup & support, but JazzHR has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
