In our comparison of Epic vs. Practice Fusion, Epic is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The enhanced features for research in this system (e.g. the ability to get to records from other agencies which wok with EPIC) are the reason why we’re continuously using it. Regarding research, invoicing and compliance, this software has been of great help.
The features that improve the ability to perform research in an educational hospital are present in EPIC. To make sure that the right fees are passed to the research study/insurance, there are methods to generate lists of patients, monitor billing, and get tailored alerts. Running reports after determining and monitoring participation and advancement of research is simple.
Some research aspects are non-intuitive. Picking up a few back end reporting systems takes time due to the learning curve present.
We moved to a disparate software set as there were multiple extraneous features not applicable to our practice while we searched for software to store printable SOAP charts and digital medical records for our medical massage therapy patients.
Reading the interface is simple, navigating landing pages is easy, getting via menus is simple, and colors pop.
For our practice, it was inappropriate or helpful.
Epic Care has a relevant interface suited for the clinical environment and a set up that is rather simple with the new layout with tab sections for the clinician. It coordinates the work and keeps continuity in the facility. Also, it helps to find out how much work still needs to be completed. It is also an important development that our institution is employing a new version which would create a flawless evenness between outpatient and inpatient.
There are no cons as such but a suggestion that EPIC should develop new ways that clinicians can come out with that would help them showcase their own unique skills based on their specialty. It may look difficult in the beginning. But, this way there will be an improvement in clinical efficiency.
At the beginning is only when I managed to contact client service. I never managed to get aid setting up my e-prescribing after signing the year contract. When paying for the monthly fee, I wasn’t able to use it for the whole year.
Signing the contract was eased and made friendly as it’s among the cheaper solutions.
Client support is terrible, setting up and using e-prescribe is not possible, client service were unreachable after cancellation (upon dislike) of the prescription during the first year which is under contract.
The enhanced features for research in this system (e.g. the ability to get to records from other agencies which wok with EPIC) are the reason why we’re continuously using it. Regarding research, invoicing and compliance, this software has been of great help.
The features that improve the ability to perform research in an educational hospital are present in EPIC. To make sure that the right fees are passed to the research study/insurance, there are methods to generate lists of patients, monitor billing, and get tailored alerts. Running reports after determining and monitoring participation and advancement of research is simple.
Some research aspects are non-intuitive. Picking up a few back end reporting systems takes time due to the learning curve present.
Epic Care has a relevant interface suited for the clinical environment and a set up that is rather simple with the new layout with tab sections for the clinician. It coordinates the work and keeps continuity in the facility. Also, it helps to find out how much work still needs to be completed. It is also an important development that our institution is employing a new version which would create a flawless evenness between outpatient and inpatient.
There are no cons as such but a suggestion that EPIC should develop new ways that clinicians can come out with that would help them showcase their own unique skills based on their specialty. It may look difficult in the beginning. But, this way there will be an improvement in clinical efficiency.
We moved to a disparate software set as there were multiple extraneous features not applicable to our practice while we searched for software to store printable SOAP charts and digital medical records for our medical massage therapy patients.
Reading the interface is simple, navigating landing pages is easy, getting via menus is simple, and colors pop.
For our practice, it was inappropriate or helpful.
At the beginning is only when I managed to contact client service. I never managed to get aid setting up my e-prescribing after signing the year contract. When paying for the monthly fee, I wasn’t able to use it for the whole year.
Signing the contract was eased and made friendly as it’s among the cheaper solutions.
Client support is terrible, setting up and using e-prescribe is not possible, client service were unreachable after cancellation (upon dislike) of the prescription during the first year which is under contract.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Epic vs. Practice Fusion, Epic has 75 user reviews and Practice Fusion has 27. The average star rating for Epic is 4.49 while Practice Fusion has an average rating of 3.59. Epic has more positive reviews than Practice Fusion. Comparing Epic vs. Practice Fusion reviews, Epic has stronger overall reviews.
Epic vs. Practice Fusion both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Medical Practice Management Features, Patient Management, eRX, Medical Charting, Laboratory Management, Insurance Claim Management, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Portal Types, Customizable Items, File Management, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Medical Specialties. In our feature comparison of Epic vs. Practice Fusion, Epic offers more of the most popular features and tools than Practice Fusion.
In our pricing comparison of Epic vs. Practice Fusion, Practice Fusion's pricing starts at $149/month and is more affordable compared to Practice Fusion's starting cost of $149/month.
Our comparison of Epic vs. Practice Fusion shows that Epic scores higher in usability for learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin. Practice Fusion scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, quality of support, but Epic has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
