In our comparison of Epic vs. iPatientCare, Epic is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The enhanced features for research in this system (e.g. the ability to get to records from other agencies which wok with EPIC) are the reason why we’re continuously using it. Regarding research, invoicing and compliance, this software has been of great help.
The features that improve the ability to perform research in an educational hospital are present in EPIC. To make sure that the right fees are passed to the research study/insurance, there are methods to generate lists of patients, monitor billing, and get tailored alerts. Running reports after determining and monitoring participation and advancement of research is simple.
Some research aspects are non-intuitive. Picking up a few back end reporting systems takes time due to the learning curve present.
ADP RUN is helpful and cost-effective, it’s a time saver, it functions as anticipated almost every time without any downtime, the client service team is extremely great as is incorporation with other hiring services, it’s powerful and it provides many diverse and helpful aspects.
It eases the payroll, offers our employees with a simple to use timecard and data portal that lets them view their pay stubs, hiring balances, and W-2s, hardly do you find mistakes in the system, has a very responsive and helpful client support team, W-2 forms are created automatically for us to mail out, ADP assists us to file taxes and employment reports thereby saving us plenty of time, RUN incorporates with ADP’s hiring services division enabling staff make alterations to their deferral percentages and investment choices directly via the Employee Access Hub. Finally, the HR411 aspect is helpful for fundamental HR questions more so when particular forms are required.
The Employee Access Hub frequently bugs and hinders a few staff from accessing their accounts, ADP has a tendency of having random sales staff reach out from time to time to try upsells instead of a committed account administrator.
Epic Care has a relevant interface suited for the clinical environment and a set up that is rather simple with the new layout with tab sections for the clinician. It coordinates the work and keeps continuity in the facility. Also, it helps to find out how much work still needs to be completed. It is also an important development that our institution is employing a new version which would create a flawless evenness between outpatient and inpatient.
There are no cons as such but a suggestion that EPIC should develop new ways that clinicians can come out with that would help them showcase their own unique skills based on their specialty. It may look difficult in the beginning. But, this way there will be an improvement in clinical efficiency.
It links numerous places of healthcare and offered the range of assistance for the organization.
Since the product is heavily relied upon, it becomes a mechanical use of the software.
The enhanced features for research in this system (e.g. the ability to get to records from other agencies which wok with EPIC) are the reason why we’re continuously using it. Regarding research, invoicing and compliance, this software has been of great help.
The features that improve the ability to perform research in an educational hospital are present in EPIC. To make sure that the right fees are passed to the research study/insurance, there are methods to generate lists of patients, monitor billing, and get tailored alerts. Running reports after determining and monitoring participation and advancement of research is simple.
Some research aspects are non-intuitive. Picking up a few back end reporting systems takes time due to the learning curve present.
Epic Care has a relevant interface suited for the clinical environment and a set up that is rather simple with the new layout with tab sections for the clinician. It coordinates the work and keeps continuity in the facility. Also, it helps to find out how much work still needs to be completed. It is also an important development that our institution is employing a new version which would create a flawless evenness between outpatient and inpatient.
There are no cons as such but a suggestion that EPIC should develop new ways that clinicians can come out with that would help them showcase their own unique skills based on their specialty. It may look difficult in the beginning. But, this way there will be an improvement in clinical efficiency.
ADP RUN is helpful and cost-effective, it’s a time saver, it functions as anticipated almost every time without any downtime, the client service team is extremely great as is incorporation with other hiring services, it’s powerful and it provides many diverse and helpful aspects.
It eases the payroll, offers our employees with a simple to use timecard and data portal that lets them view their pay stubs, hiring balances, and W-2s, hardly do you find mistakes in the system, has a very responsive and helpful client support team, W-2 forms are created automatically for us to mail out, ADP assists us to file taxes and employment reports thereby saving us plenty of time, RUN incorporates with ADP’s hiring services division enabling staff make alterations to their deferral percentages and investment choices directly via the Employee Access Hub. Finally, the HR411 aspect is helpful for fundamental HR questions more so when particular forms are required.
The Employee Access Hub frequently bugs and hinders a few staff from accessing their accounts, ADP has a tendency of having random sales staff reach out from time to time to try upsells instead of a committed account administrator.
It links numerous places of healthcare and offered the range of assistance for the organization.
Since the product is heavily relied upon, it becomes a mechanical use of the software.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Epic vs. iPatientCare, iPatientCare has 2 user reviews and Epic has 75. The average star rating for iPatientCare is 5 while Epic has an average rating of 4.49. iPatientCare has more positive reviews than Epic. Comparing Epic vs. iPatientCare reviews, iPatientCare has stronger overall reviews.
Epic vs. iPatientCare both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Medical Practice Management Features, Patient Management, eRX, Medical Charting, Laboratory Management, Insurance Claim Management, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Portal Types, Customizable Items, Document Management, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Medical Specialties. In our feature comparison of Epic vs. iPatientCare, Epic offers more of the most popular features and tools than iPatientCare.
In our pricing comparison of Epic vs. iPatientCare, iPatientCare's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to iPatientCare's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Epic vs. iPatientCare shows that Epic scores higher in usability for meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. iPatientCare scores higher in ease of use, but Epic has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
