In our comparison of ChartLogic vs. IntakeQ, ChartLogic is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Nice support.
Setup, processing, editing, and medications through electronics is easy.
Sometimes there are a few connectivity issues.
I am extremely satisfied with this app.
I like IntakeQ because it is easy to use, secure receiving and sending information, HIPPA compliant, provide patient information like their insurance cards and ids. Excellent service.
It would be good if they added the incoming tax feature too. Forms can be made easier once you have learned how to make them. I would be glad if I received alerts not only when the patient completes the form but when they start filing them too.
The program is user-friendly, intuitive, and packed with a lot of amazing features. I like that it lets me use smart fields, templates, and more. It also helps me save time when doing charting tasks as some of the template fields are already filled automatically.
E-Prescribing is terrible. It requires a lot of steps since this part of the program is not intuitive.
The form meets all HIPPA requirements and they can be customized.
IntakeQ offered a solution to the several complaints regarding intake forms and their updating for upcoming evaluation.
None.
Nice support.
Setup, processing, editing, and medications through electronics is easy.
Sometimes there are a few connectivity issues.
The program is user-friendly, intuitive, and packed with a lot of amazing features. I like that it lets me use smart fields, templates, and more. It also helps me save time when doing charting tasks as some of the template fields are already filled automatically.
E-Prescribing is terrible. It requires a lot of steps since this part of the program is not intuitive.
I am extremely satisfied with this app.
I like IntakeQ because it is easy to use, secure receiving and sending information, HIPPA compliant, provide patient information like their insurance cards and ids. Excellent service.
It would be good if they added the incoming tax feature too. Forms can be made easier once you have learned how to make them. I would be glad if I received alerts not only when the patient completes the form but when they start filing them too.
The form meets all HIPPA requirements and they can be customized.
IntakeQ offered a solution to the several complaints regarding intake forms and their updating for upcoming evaluation.
None.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of ChartLogic vs. IntakeQ, IntakeQ has 32 user reviews and ChartLogic has 8. The average star rating for IntakeQ is 4.84 while ChartLogic has an average rating of 3.12. IntakeQ has more positive reviews than ChartLogic. Comparing ChartLogic vs. IntakeQ reviews, IntakeQ has stronger overall reviews.
ChartLogic vs. IntakeQ both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Medical Practice Management Features, Patient Management, eRX, Medical Charting, Laboratory Management, Insurance Claim Management, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Portal Types, Customizable Items, File Management, Appointments/Scheduling, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of ChartLogic vs. IntakeQ, ChartLogic offers more of the most popular features and tools than IntakeQ.
In our pricing comparison of ChartLogic vs. IntakeQ, IntakeQ's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to IntakeQ's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of ChartLogic vs. IntakeQ shows that ChartLogic scores higher in usability for setup & support. IntakeQ scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support, ease of admin, but ChartLogic has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
