In our comparison of Blue Jeans vs. HighFive Video Conferencing, HighFive Video Conferencing is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
The audio and video quality calls are incredibly effective, the naturally existing gap in communication between the offshore and full time designers has been eased by this software, and collaboration with the offshore group is possible courtesy of BlueJeans.
The bandwidth consumed by BlueJeans exceeds the normal consumption.
The standout feature of cloud storage for recorded conferences adds significant value, enhancing the overall utility and efficiency of the platform. For users considering Zoom, it's crucial to evaluate the size of the groups involved in video conferences. Understanding the performance limitations with a larger number of participants can help in making an informed decision.
Zoom excels in providing a tool for conducting dynamic and high-definition videoconferences with excellent audio quality.
Zoom does have a limitation when it comes to larger groups, and when more than 90 people connect, performance tends to slow down significantly. Issues such as audio or video pausing and, at times, losing the entire video conference can occur, impacting the overall effectiveness of the platform.
When installing platforms and servers for our clients, we communicate with 30 of them (disparate) every month. Also, every day, we use it with our infrastructure team.
Smooth presentations, exceptional quality of audio and video,
Extremely slow and inaccurate remote control, the platform at times requests you to setup the software making people get puzzled yet the web interface is quite faulty.
Highfive assists us to link with many remote staff and offers face to face communication and screen sharing ability. It is simple to begin feeling detached from one another seeing that our department is divided across to offices one on each coast. This software is used to aid close the gap offering us the capability to effortlessly have a combined team meeting between the two offices in our respective conference halls. Its use of screen of sharing aids us in managing to offer a simple method to fast go via PowerPoint presentations or show the team how to achieve a certain workflow.
Excellent for linking with remote staff and offering face to face conversations and screen sharing ability, ideal for corporations with numerous offices, or staff out in the field, it’s helpful even if you don’t have remote reps, the software’s sharing capabilities offer a simple method to fast walk via PowerPoint presentations or even illustrate to the team how to attain a certain workflow, and its suitable for duping your staff when they least anticipate it.
The software occasionally lags or functions slowly if you or a participant of yours in the meeting has slow internet and you can be duped by you fellow staff.
The audio and video quality calls are incredibly effective, the naturally existing gap in communication between the offshore and full time designers has been eased by this software, and collaboration with the offshore group is possible courtesy of BlueJeans.
The bandwidth consumed by BlueJeans exceeds the normal consumption.
When installing platforms and servers for our clients, we communicate with 30 of them (disparate) every month. Also, every day, we use it with our infrastructure team.
Smooth presentations, exceptional quality of audio and video,
Extremely slow and inaccurate remote control, the platform at times requests you to setup the software making people get puzzled yet the web interface is quite faulty.
The standout feature of cloud storage for recorded conferences adds significant value, enhancing the overall utility and efficiency of the platform. For users considering Zoom, it's crucial to evaluate the size of the groups involved in video conferences. Understanding the performance limitations with a larger number of participants can help in making an informed decision.
Zoom excels in providing a tool for conducting dynamic and high-definition videoconferences with excellent audio quality.
Zoom does have a limitation when it comes to larger groups, and when more than 90 people connect, performance tends to slow down significantly. Issues such as audio or video pausing and, at times, losing the entire video conference can occur, impacting the overall effectiveness of the platform.
Highfive assists us to link with many remote staff and offers face to face communication and screen sharing ability. It is simple to begin feeling detached from one another seeing that our department is divided across to offices one on each coast. This software is used to aid close the gap offering us the capability to effortlessly have a combined team meeting between the two offices in our respective conference halls. Its use of screen of sharing aids us in managing to offer a simple method to fast go via PowerPoint presentations or show the team how to achieve a certain workflow.
Excellent for linking with remote staff and offering face to face conversations and screen sharing ability, ideal for corporations with numerous offices, or staff out in the field, it’s helpful even if you don’t have remote reps, the software’s sharing capabilities offer a simple method to fast walk via PowerPoint presentations or even illustrate to the team how to attain a certain workflow, and its suitable for duping your staff when they least anticipate it.
The software occasionally lags or functions slowly if you or a participant of yours in the meeting has slow internet and you can be duped by you fellow staff.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Blue Jeans vs. HighFive Video Conferencing, HighFive Video Conferencing has 26 user reviews and Blue Jeans has 36. The average star rating for HighFive Video Conferencing is 4.61 while Blue Jeans has an average rating of 4.33. HighFive Video Conferencing has more positive reviews than Blue Jeans. Comparing Blue Jeans vs. HighFive Video Conferencing reviews, HighFive Video Conferencing has stronger overall reviews.
Blue Jeans vs. HighFive Video Conferencing both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Conferencing Capabilities, Presenter Controls, Remote Support Features, Phone System Features, Collaboration Tools, Customizable Items, Enhancements & Personalization, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Blue Jeans vs. HighFive Video Conferencing, Blue Jeans offers more of the most popular features and tools than HighFive Video Conferencing.
In our pricing comparison of Blue Jeans vs. HighFive Video Conferencing, HighFive Video Conferencing's pricing starts at $15/month and is more affordable compared to Blue Jeans's starting cost of $9.99/month.
Our comparison of Blue Jeans vs. HighFive Video Conferencing shows that Blue Jeans scores higher in usability for learning curve, quality of support. HighFive Video Conferencing scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, ease of admin, but Blue Jeans has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
