In our comparison of Alfresco vs. Drupal, Alfresco is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The product excels in managing a vast archive of documents spanning over 25 years. It significantly simplifies document approval processes, facilitates records conversion, and enables efficient archival of older documents.
Effective Document Workflow Functionality. User-Friendly Document Metadata Management. Developer and End-User Friendly Interface
Increasing Complexity of Local Installation Post-Version 5.1.1.4. Customization Deployment Challenges in Alfresco
Some heavy lifting was initially needed when setting up Drupal. However, all ran seamlessly once it was in place.
Creating and developing complicated, material-rich webs with several modules of Drupal is incredibly simple after the software is up and functioning, it has a fairly active community and makes sure your CMS is future proofed, this software is open source, adding features like extend libraries, admin UI, etc is possible by leveraging Drupal, etc
A rather hard installation process and we had to leverage a web programmer for more complicated integrations in Drupal.
It has great customization features, it is compatible with multiple types of files, work flow options are great, it is easy to search for documents, the ability to customize your summary of that project, offering visuals to members thanks to the setting of the dashboard on every site, and the ability to know if the project is website based courtesy of the live browser frame.
The interface could be better, unlocking all the functionality and features available to you takes the usability some time.
To those that are serious about websites development that scale, I always recommend Drupal to them.
You’re given a starting point by the numerous setup profiles available, almost all the modules are free, has a very invaluable open-source community that is ever bringing in new models, the ability to develop complicated sets of data that can link with your present products as the software is database driven, with no custom code, you can create level sites of an Enterprise, and Drupal has an outstanding CDN module that operates with Amazon AWS for loading time that is extremely fast.
The learning curve is steep and becoming a professional user is time consuming.
The product excels in managing a vast archive of documents spanning over 25 years. It significantly simplifies document approval processes, facilitates records conversion, and enables efficient archival of older documents.
Effective Document Workflow Functionality. User-Friendly Document Metadata Management. Developer and End-User Friendly Interface
Increasing Complexity of Local Installation Post-Version 5.1.1.4. Customization Deployment Challenges in Alfresco
It has great customization features, it is compatible with multiple types of files, work flow options are great, it is easy to search for documents, the ability to customize your summary of that project, offering visuals to members thanks to the setting of the dashboard on every site, and the ability to know if the project is website based courtesy of the live browser frame.
The interface could be better, unlocking all the functionality and features available to you takes the usability some time.
Some heavy lifting was initially needed when setting up Drupal. However, all ran seamlessly once it was in place.
Creating and developing complicated, material-rich webs with several modules of Drupal is incredibly simple after the software is up and functioning, it has a fairly active community and makes sure your CMS is future proofed, this software is open source, adding features like extend libraries, admin UI, etc is possible by leveraging Drupal, etc
A rather hard installation process and we had to leverage a web programmer for more complicated integrations in Drupal.
To those that are serious about websites development that scale, I always recommend Drupal to them.
You’re given a starting point by the numerous setup profiles available, almost all the modules are free, has a very invaluable open-source community that is ever bringing in new models, the ability to develop complicated sets of data that can link with your present products as the software is database driven, with no custom code, you can create level sites of an Enterprise, and Drupal has an outstanding CDN module that operates with Amazon AWS for loading time that is extremely fast.
The learning curve is steep and becoming a professional user is time consuming.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Alfresco vs. Drupal, Drupal has 26 user reviews and Alfresco has 13. The average star rating for Drupal is 4.42 while Alfresco has an average rating of 4.38. Drupal has more positive reviews than Alfresco. Comparing Alfresco vs. Drupal reviews, Drupal has stronger overall reviews.
Alfresco vs. Drupal both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management System (CMS) Features, Document Management, Supported File Formats, Signature Management, Data Management, Supported Content Types, Search Tools, Collaboration Tools, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365. In our feature comparison of Alfresco vs. Drupal, Alfresco offers more of the most popular features and tools than Drupal.
In our pricing comparison of Alfresco vs. Drupal, Drupal's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Drupal's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Alfresco vs. Drupal shows that Alfresco scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin. Drupal scores higher in setup & support, quality of support, but Alfresco has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
