In our comparison of Adobe Connect vs. Zoho Meeting, Adobe Connect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
Navigation is easy and the use is convenient. The ease of use is the hallmark of this software. For a meeting with more than forty participants, it works well.
No cons as it works great. Sometimes a restart is needed to do the work.
My use of zoho is only for meetings. I understand how important the quality of sound and video is when you are having an important but distant meeting. While working with other tools I always had some issues. But with Zoho, my experience is quite outstanding.
It is very easy in use and its simple interface facilitates the ease. I will not claim it to be the best but I consider it to be the easiest. The speed with which it gets connected can beat any better software.
I would like to be additional features added.
Adobe Connect for video sessions, recording meetings and watching other user’s screens is possible, and it has modern interface, chat features, etc.
Awful recording quality, it is impossible to send bulky files, and chatting is interfered with easily.
Good fundamental features e.g. screen sharing, invites, calls, etc.
Occasional disconnecting of screen sharing, audio quality is poor at times.
Navigation is easy and the use is convenient. The ease of use is the hallmark of this software. For a meeting with more than forty participants, it works well.
No cons as it works great. Sometimes a restart is needed to do the work.
Adobe Connect for video sessions, recording meetings and watching other user’s screens is possible, and it has modern interface, chat features, etc.
Awful recording quality, it is impossible to send bulky files, and chatting is interfered with easily.
My use of zoho is only for meetings. I understand how important the quality of sound and video is when you are having an important but distant meeting. While working with other tools I always had some issues. But with Zoho, my experience is quite outstanding.
It is very easy in use and its simple interface facilitates the ease. I will not claim it to be the best but I consider it to be the easiest. The speed with which it gets connected can beat any better software.
I would like to be additional features added.
Good fundamental features e.g. screen sharing, invites, calls, etc.
Occasional disconnecting of screen sharing, audio quality is poor at times.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Adobe Connect vs. Zoho Meeting, Zoho Meeting has 28 user reviews and Adobe Connect has 138. The average star rating for Zoho Meeting is 4.67 while Adobe Connect has an average rating of 4.50. Zoho Meeting has more positive reviews than Adobe Connect. Comparing Adobe Connect vs. Zoho Meeting reviews, Zoho Meeting has stronger overall reviews.
Adobe Connect vs. Zoho Meeting both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Conferencing Capabilities, Remote Support Features, Chat/IM Management, Collaboration Tools, File Management, Customizable Items, Language & Speech, Reminders/Alerts, Course Management, Enhancements & Personalization, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Limits. In our feature comparison of Adobe Connect vs. Zoho Meeting, Adobe Connect offers more of the most popular features and tools than Zoho Meeting.
In our pricing comparison of Adobe Connect vs. Zoho Meeting, Zoho Meeting's pricing starts at Free/month and is more affordable compared to Zoho Meeting's starting cost of Free/month.
Our comparison of Adobe Connect vs. Zoho Meeting shows that Adobe Connect scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support, ease of admin. Zoho Meeting scores higher in setup & support, but Adobe Connect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
