In our comparison of Adobe Campaign vs. Net-Results, Net-Results is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
NetSuite has enabled us to automate numerous procedures and the interface is normally user-friendly. Also, we have dependable numbers and the ability to develop a search or report to facilitate analysis of information. NetSuite is generally great.
Scalable, customizable, offers plenty of process automation, it’s a better source of record-keeping as all is rather flawlessly linked, very helpful batch upload of journal entries/transactions and upload in general, and a great ability to report on all assets and have their history in a single place id helpful for audit purposes.
Presently, we’re implementing regulations for 606 and the multi-book and ARM add-ons have emerged to be extremely helpful for our reporting needs. The search function has great adaptability for creating reports for end month reconciliation needs.
SuiteAnswers has an awful algorithm for their search bar, the system is not very intuitive since the real home screen is personalized by role, and the call center isn’t as helpful as the US based analysts at NetSuite. Also, since our software is hosted, it sometimes functions slower than I’d want it to.
Net-Results has very many abilities, has exceptional support staff, you can advance your business if you spend time to learn the software in details and if you don’t want to spend too much time, you can get what you put into Net-Results.
Some of their pages are non-functional as they’re presently improving their education. It is time consuming to load campaigns at times.
While handling campaigns, it runs smoothly
Knowing where you are in the system is difficult.
Routing is now much simpler, you get a better view of our service area by being able to view all the countless addresses mapped out at the same time. This lets us to perform our best at being more effective.
Bulk entering and data importation is simple, it preserves former saved routes I don’t think I will require but I indeed will, excellent client service-fast and helpful.
None
NetSuite has enabled us to automate numerous procedures and the interface is normally user-friendly. Also, we have dependable numbers and the ability to develop a search or report to facilitate analysis of information. NetSuite is generally great.
Scalable, customizable, offers plenty of process automation, it’s a better source of record-keeping as all is rather flawlessly linked, very helpful batch upload of journal entries/transactions and upload in general, and a great ability to report on all assets and have their history in a single place id helpful for audit purposes.
Presently, we’re implementing regulations for 606 and the multi-book and ARM add-ons have emerged to be extremely helpful for our reporting needs. The search function has great adaptability for creating reports for end month reconciliation needs.
SuiteAnswers has an awful algorithm for their search bar, the system is not very intuitive since the real home screen is personalized by role, and the call center isn’t as helpful as the US based analysts at NetSuite. Also, since our software is hosted, it sometimes functions slower than I’d want it to.
While handling campaigns, it runs smoothly
Knowing where you are in the system is difficult.
Net-Results has very many abilities, has exceptional support staff, you can advance your business if you spend time to learn the software in details and if you don’t want to spend too much time, you can get what you put into Net-Results.
Some of their pages are non-functional as they’re presently improving their education. It is time consuming to load campaigns at times.
Routing is now much simpler, you get a better view of our service area by being able to view all the countless addresses mapped out at the same time. This lets us to perform our best at being more effective.
Bulk entering and data importation is simple, it preserves former saved routes I don’t think I will require but I indeed will, excellent client service-fast and helpful.
None
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Adobe Campaign vs. Net-Results, Adobe Campaign has 42 user reviews and Net-Results has 12. The average star rating for Adobe Campaign is 4.26 while Net-Results has an average rating of 4.25. Adobe Campaign has more positive reviews than Net-Results. Comparing Adobe Campaign vs. Net-Results reviews, Adobe Campaign has stronger overall reviews.
Adobe Campaign vs. Net-Results both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Customer Management, Event Management, Reporting & Analytics, Supported Channels, User Calls-to-Action, Email Management, Appointments/Scheduling, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Customizable Items, Data Management, Content Management System (CMS) Features, Systems/Administrative, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC). In our feature comparison of Adobe Campaign vs. Net-Results, Net-Results offers more of the most popular features and tools than Adobe Campaign.
In our pricing comparison of Adobe Campaign vs. Net-Results, Net-Results's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Net-Results's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Adobe Campaign vs. Net-Results shows that Net-Results scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin. Adobe Campaign scores higher in meets requirements, quality of support, but Net-Results has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
