In our comparison of Adobe Campaign vs. Integrate, Adobe Campaign is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
NetSuite has enabled us to automate numerous procedures and the interface is normally user-friendly. Also, we have dependable numbers and the ability to develop a search or report to facilitate analysis of information. NetSuite is generally great.
Scalable, customizable, offers plenty of process automation, it’s a better source of record-keeping as all is rather flawlessly linked, very helpful batch upload of journal entries/transactions and upload in general, and a great ability to report on all assets and have their history in a single place id helpful for audit purposes.
Presently, we’re implementing regulations for 606 and the multi-book and ARM add-ons have emerged to be extremely helpful for our reporting needs. The search function has great adaptability for creating reports for end month reconciliation needs.
SuiteAnswers has an awful algorithm for their search bar, the system is not very intuitive since the real home screen is personalized by role, and the call center isn’t as helpful as the US based analysts at NetSuite. Also, since our software is hosted, it sometimes functions slower than I’d want it to.
Using it is simple, having updated technology is easy, and it is ideal for leads purchases and sales.
When linking to sellers and buyers, it is at times slow.
While handling campaigns, it runs smoothly
Knowing where you are in the system is difficult.
We've discovered that the lead flow on the platform is really smooth after setting up campaigns, saving our team a significant amount of time that would otherwise be spent on manual list uploads. Whenever we have required support, the Integrate team has always been there. But if problems occur, campaign setup can be time-consuming; hence, long-term campaigns are preferable to short-term ones. Overall, it has streamlined our processes by significantly reducing the manual workload of our marketing team.
Seamless lead flow, time-saving from manual list uploads, great customer support from Integrate team.
Lengthy campaign set-up for issues, better suited for longer-term campaigns.
NetSuite has enabled us to automate numerous procedures and the interface is normally user-friendly. Also, we have dependable numbers and the ability to develop a search or report to facilitate analysis of information. NetSuite is generally great.
Scalable, customizable, offers plenty of process automation, it’s a better source of record-keeping as all is rather flawlessly linked, very helpful batch upload of journal entries/transactions and upload in general, and a great ability to report on all assets and have their history in a single place id helpful for audit purposes.
Presently, we’re implementing regulations for 606 and the multi-book and ARM add-ons have emerged to be extremely helpful for our reporting needs. The search function has great adaptability for creating reports for end month reconciliation needs.
SuiteAnswers has an awful algorithm for their search bar, the system is not very intuitive since the real home screen is personalized by role, and the call center isn’t as helpful as the US based analysts at NetSuite. Also, since our software is hosted, it sometimes functions slower than I’d want it to.
While handling campaigns, it runs smoothly
Knowing where you are in the system is difficult.
Using it is simple, having updated technology is easy, and it is ideal for leads purchases and sales.
When linking to sellers and buyers, it is at times slow.
We've discovered that the lead flow on the platform is really smooth after setting up campaigns, saving our team a significant amount of time that would otherwise be spent on manual list uploads. Whenever we have required support, the Integrate team has always been there. But if problems occur, campaign setup can be time-consuming; hence, long-term campaigns are preferable to short-term ones. Overall, it has streamlined our processes by significantly reducing the manual workload of our marketing team.
Seamless lead flow, time-saving from manual list uploads, great customer support from Integrate team.
Lengthy campaign set-up for issues, better suited for longer-term campaigns.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Adobe Campaign vs. Integrate, Adobe Campaign has 43 user reviews and Integrate has 9. The average star rating for Adobe Campaign is 4.25 while Integrate has an average rating of 4. Adobe Campaign has more positive reviews than Integrate. Comparing Adobe Campaign vs. Integrate reviews, Adobe Campaign has stronger overall reviews.
Adobe Campaign vs. Integrate both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Customer Management, Event Management, Reporting & Analytics, Supported Channels, Project Management Features, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Customizable Items, Content Management, Systems/Administrative, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of Adobe Campaign vs. Integrate, Adobe Campaign offers more of the most popular features and tools than Integrate.
In our pricing comparison of Adobe Campaign vs. Integrate, Integrate's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Integrate's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Adobe Campaign vs. Integrate shows that Adobe Campaign scores higher in usability for quality of support. Integrate scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin, but Adobe Campaign has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.