In our comparison of Act-On vs. Integrate, Act-On is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
It allows me to be in contact with my prospects. I love this tool and recommend it to all!
It has a timeline that helps me a lot in completing my projects on time. It keeps me and my team organized. It literally has determined the future of marketing automation.
There are some issues we are constructively facing within the program. They should inform us at least before performing any change or update.
Using it is simple, having updated technology is easy, and it is ideal for leads purchases and sales.
When linking to sellers and buyers, it is at times slow.
It is a stunning platform for marketing automation.
An easy-to-use tool that can be taught easily too.
It is a little problematic regarding its layout. The buttons are not attractive.
Integrate won us over with its seamless integration capabilities, making it a breeze to connect our Salesforce system and later transition to linking our Marketo database. The process was notably smooth and contributed to the efficiency of our operations.
The platform addresses specific needs, providing robust support throughout the integration process.
One area of improvement lies in the clarity of error messages, particularly during integration mappings.
It allows me to be in contact with my prospects. I love this tool and recommend it to all!
It has a timeline that helps me a lot in completing my projects on time. It keeps me and my team organized. It literally has determined the future of marketing automation.
There are some issues we are constructively facing within the program. They should inform us at least before performing any change or update.
It is a stunning platform for marketing automation.
An easy-to-use tool that can be taught easily too.
It is a little problematic regarding its layout. The buttons are not attractive.
Using it is simple, having updated technology is easy, and it is ideal for leads purchases and sales.
When linking to sellers and buyers, it is at times slow.
Integrate won us over with its seamless integration capabilities, making it a breeze to connect our Salesforce system and later transition to linking our Marketo database. The process was notably smooth and contributed to the efficiency of our operations.
The platform addresses specific needs, providing robust support throughout the integration process.
One area of improvement lies in the clarity of error messages, particularly during integration mappings.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Act-On vs. Integrate, Act-On has 63 user reviews and Integrate has 8. The average star rating for Act-On is 4.36 while Integrate has an average rating of 4. Act-On has more positive reviews than Integrate. Comparing Act-On vs. Integrate reviews, Act-On has stronger overall reviews.
Act-On vs. Integrate both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Lead Management, Campaign Management, Campaign Types, Reporting & Analytics, Supported Channels, Customizable Items, Integration Options. In our feature comparison of Act-On vs. Integrate, Act-On offers more of the most popular features and tools than Integrate.
In our pricing comparison of Act-On vs. Integrate, Integrate's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Integrate's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Act-On vs. Integrate shows that Act-On scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support. Integrate scores higher in ease of admin, but Act-On has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
