In our comparison of Greenhouse vs. ZipRecruiter, ZipRecruiter is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The candidates can be chosen and interviewed taken into consideration through a variety of platforms. The scheduling, knowing the availability, integration, sourcing, interviewing, and flow of the information is very handy and spontaneous. The Candidates’ resumes can be downloaded from other sites.
You need to learn a bit before starting using it. I am still in the learning process. A little more support from the helpdesk will be appreciated.
This platform is effective for advertising and spreading the word about available job positions.
I suggest utilizing this resource to attract potential candidates and assess their level of engagement.
The advantage of this platform is that it can attract active candidates who are actively searching for opportunities.
Even if candidates do not meet the criteria, their applications are still showcased. It would be convenient to have a dedicated space to review them at your convenience.
The only edge it has against its competitors is the customer chat, which is surprisingly good. They can overtake their competitors if they know the needs of their customers.
The user interface is easy to navigate.
Some beneficial features are available in other software that would have been great here.
ZipRecruiter helps us to find quality candidates for interview and subsequently to recruit. We greatly endorse this software.
Powerful search, wonderful interface, ability to send messages to people within the site, and a very exceptional customer support team.
Quite aggressive follow-ups from the sales personnel, and the search occasionally pulls in useless candidates.
The candidates can be chosen and interviewed taken into consideration through a variety of platforms. The scheduling, knowing the availability, integration, sourcing, interviewing, and flow of the information is very handy and spontaneous. The Candidates’ resumes can be downloaded from other sites.
You need to learn a bit before starting using it. I am still in the learning process. A little more support from the helpdesk will be appreciated.
The only edge it has against its competitors is the customer chat, which is surprisingly good. They can overtake their competitors if they know the needs of their customers.
The user interface is easy to navigate.
Some beneficial features are available in other software that would have been great here.
This platform is effective for advertising and spreading the word about available job positions.
I suggest utilizing this resource to attract potential candidates and assess their level of engagement.
The advantage of this platform is that it can attract active candidates who are actively searching for opportunities.
Even if candidates do not meet the criteria, their applications are still showcased. It would be convenient to have a dedicated space to review them at your convenience.
ZipRecruiter helps us to find quality candidates for interview and subsequently to recruit. We greatly endorse this software.
Powerful search, wonderful interface, ability to send messages to people within the site, and a very exceptional customer support team.
Quite aggressive follow-ups from the sales personnel, and the search occasionally pulls in useless candidates.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Greenhouse vs. ZipRecruiter, Greenhouse has 74 user reviews and ZipRecruiter has 113. The average star rating for Greenhouse is 4.55 while ZipRecruiter has an average rating of 4.15. Greenhouse has more positive reviews than ZipRecruiter. Comparing Greenhouse vs. ZipRecruiter reviews, Greenhouse has stronger overall reviews.
Greenhouse vs. ZipRecruiter both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Talent Management , Supported Channels, Customizable Items, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Project Management Features, Language & Speech, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Zoho, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Greenhouse vs. ZipRecruiter, ZipRecruiter offers more of the most popular features and tools than Greenhouse.
In our pricing comparison of Greenhouse vs. ZipRecruiter, ZipRecruiter's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to ZipRecruiter's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Greenhouse vs. ZipRecruiter shows that ZipRecruiter scores higher in usability for . Greenhouse scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but ZipRecruiter has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
