In our comparison of WebPT vs. athenaClinicals, athenaClinicals is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
WebPT is used by speech-language pathologists, occupational practitioners, and physiotherapists. It is accessible from anywhere using any internet-connected device, making it simple to take notes and record patient progress. Additionally incredibly user-friendly and simple to use is WebPT. Both readers and therapists will find the arrangement to be comfortable and helpful. Additionally, the program provides strong billing and insurance tools that make it simple to submit claims and keep track of payments. Users complain that WebPT prevents them from simultaneously using two devices. If your clinic has several PCs, this may be difficult.
Available on any device with internet, user friendly, ergonomic layout and streamlines note writing
No way to be notified of incomplete fields and same user on two devices at once is not possible
Clinicals has significantly improved our ability to navigate patient charts and doctor's notes, simplifying our daily tasks and enhancing patient communication.
Streamlining the management of patient charts and information, offering a stress-free and efficient platform for communication with patients.
None
I can access my patients' medical records using this software from anywhere in the globe, and it gives me access to real-time data, past results, and therapy administration. I have easy access to their medical history and can even visit their residences. For providing individualized treatment, the application's capacity to be accessed from my own devices outside of the workplace is crucial. But since I can't access a local database, I have to rely on internet access, which makes it challenging to contact patients who live far away. It can also be annoying to deal with the intricate and initially difficult graphical interface.
Accessibility, excellent data transfer rates,flexibility
Internet dependence, complex interface, mobile version limitations
For medical practices with licensed MDs, LCSWs, LMHCs, LCACs, and LMFTs, Athena is a game-changer. Its efficiency in managing diagnoses, allergies, medications, and appointments makes it a top recommendation, especially for practices that incorporate behavioral health and mental health services.
User-friendly system, ensuring a seamless transition to the next steps in our medical practice. The layout is intuitive, making it easy to access crucial information such as diagnoses, allergies, medications, and appointments.
Inability to integrate with our non-licensed practitioners.
WebPT is used by speech-language pathologists, occupational practitioners, and physiotherapists. It is accessible from anywhere using any internet-connected device, making it simple to take notes and record patient progress. Additionally incredibly user-friendly and simple to use is WebPT. Both readers and therapists will find the arrangement to be comfortable and helpful. Additionally, the program provides strong billing and insurance tools that make it simple to submit claims and keep track of payments. Users complain that WebPT prevents them from simultaneously using two devices. If your clinic has several PCs, this may be difficult.
Available on any device with internet, user friendly, ergonomic layout and streamlines note writing
No way to be notified of incomplete fields and same user on two devices at once is not possible
I can access my patients' medical records using this software from anywhere in the globe, and it gives me access to real-time data, past results, and therapy administration. I have easy access to their medical history and can even visit their residences. For providing individualized treatment, the application's capacity to be accessed from my own devices outside of the workplace is crucial. But since I can't access a local database, I have to rely on internet access, which makes it challenging to contact patients who live far away. It can also be annoying to deal with the intricate and initially difficult graphical interface.
Accessibility, excellent data transfer rates,flexibility
Internet dependence, complex interface, mobile version limitations
Clinicals has significantly improved our ability to navigate patient charts and doctor's notes, simplifying our daily tasks and enhancing patient communication.
Streamlining the management of patient charts and information, offering a stress-free and efficient platform for communication with patients.
None
For medical practices with licensed MDs, LCSWs, LMHCs, LCACs, and LMFTs, Athena is a game-changer. Its efficiency in managing diagnoses, allergies, medications, and appointments makes it a top recommendation, especially for practices that incorporate behavioral health and mental health services.
User-friendly system, ensuring a seamless transition to the next steps in our medical practice. The layout is intuitive, making it easy to access crucial information such as diagnoses, allergies, medications, and appointments.
Inability to integrate with our non-licensed practitioners.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of WebPT vs. athenaClinicals, athenaClinicals has 8 user reviews and WebPT has 18. The average star rating for athenaClinicals is 4.25 while WebPT has an average rating of 4. athenaClinicals has more positive reviews than WebPT. Comparing WebPT vs. athenaClinicals reviews, athenaClinicals has stronger overall reviews.
WebPT vs. athenaClinicals both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Medical Practice Management Features, Patient Management, eRX, Medical Charting, Laboratory Management, Insurance Claim Management, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Portal Types, File Management, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Medical Specialties. In our feature comparison of WebPT vs. athenaClinicals, athenaClinicals offers more of the most popular features and tools than WebPT.
In our pricing comparison of WebPT vs. athenaClinicals, athenaClinicals's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to athenaClinicals's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of WebPT vs. athenaClinicals shows that athenaClinicals scores higher in usability for ease of admin. WebPT scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support, but athenaClinicals has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
