In our comparison of SAP S/4HANA vs. Watson Campaign Automation, SAP S/4HANA is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
SAP is undoubtedly the ideal software on the market (comprehensive CRM package) for large organizations, almost everything in the software can be configured, addictive to use after knowing how it operates, and any command that you give it will be executed provided it is well configured.
Numerous features and modules, flexible, and can be configured easily.
Expensive, terrible German tables, resources are required, and the default UI doesn't fit all.
Its intuitive interface and comprehensive features make it a powerful choice, although some improvements in the WYSIWYG editor would be welcome.
Flexible scoring options, including BANT and behavioral scoring. Detailed reporting capabilities. Personalization and dynamic content for various elements.
Minor quirks with the WYSIWYG editor; split source and design views would be beneficial.
It has a steep learning curve. Someone with strong IT skills is needed to run it.
It offers many things that are good like functionality, reports, views, and tools for analysis and forecasting.
It has a steep learning curve.
It is helpful in scheduling emails to get to know the clients and communicating better in the future with them.
The quality check of emails before scheduling is very useful to gain a better experience of scheduling emails.
The customer service could be improved. Because, in spite of scheduling, my mails could not be sent. The customer support does not help much in this regard in spite of inquiry.
SAP is undoubtedly the ideal software on the market (comprehensive CRM package) for large organizations, almost everything in the software can be configured, addictive to use after knowing how it operates, and any command that you give it will be executed provided it is well configured.
Numerous features and modules, flexible, and can be configured easily.
Expensive, terrible German tables, resources are required, and the default UI doesn't fit all.
It has a steep learning curve. Someone with strong IT skills is needed to run it.
It offers many things that are good like functionality, reports, views, and tools for analysis and forecasting.
It has a steep learning curve.
Its intuitive interface and comprehensive features make it a powerful choice, although some improvements in the WYSIWYG editor would be welcome.
Flexible scoring options, including BANT and behavioral scoring. Detailed reporting capabilities. Personalization and dynamic content for various elements.
Minor quirks with the WYSIWYG editor; split source and design views would be beneficial.
It is helpful in scheduling emails to get to know the clients and communicating better in the future with them.
The quality check of emails before scheduling is very useful to gain a better experience of scheduling emails.
The customer service could be improved. Because, in spite of scheduling, my mails could not be sent. The customer support does not help much in this regard in spite of inquiry.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of SAP S/4HANA vs. Watson Campaign Automation, SAP S/4HANA has 98 user reviews and Watson Campaign Automation has 14. The average star rating for SAP S/4HANA is 4.27 while Watson Campaign Automation has an average rating of 4. SAP S/4HANA has more positive reviews than Watson Campaign Automation. Comparing SAP S/4HANA vs. Watson Campaign Automation reviews, SAP S/4HANA has stronger overall reviews.
SAP S/4HANA vs. Watson Campaign Automation both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Manufacturing/Production Management, Inventory Management, Cash Flow Management, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Customer Management, Accounting Features, Employee Management, Lead Management, Event Management, Asset Management, Campaign Management, Tax Management, Supported Tax Forms, Reporting & Analytics, Shipping & Logistics Management, Workforce Optimization, Payroll Management, Project Management Features, Workflow Automation, Expense Management, Resource Management, File Management, Collaboration Tools, Conferencing Capabilities, Portal Types, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Report Management, Data Management, Data Migration, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Supported Technologies, Campaign Types, Chat/IM Management, Route Management. In our feature comparison of SAP S/4HANA vs. Watson Campaign Automation, SAP S/4HANA offers more of the most popular features and tools than Watson Campaign Automation.
In our pricing comparison of SAP S/4HANA vs. Watson Campaign Automation, Watson Campaign Automation's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Watson Campaign Automation's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of SAP S/4HANA vs. Watson Campaign Automation shows that SAP S/4HANA scores higher in usability for meets requirements, quality of support. Watson Campaign Automation scores higher in ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin, but SAP S/4HANA has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
