In our comparison of QAD vs. SYSPRO, SYSPRO is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Deploying QAD was a breeze, and the transition from our previous ERP system to this one was remarkably smooth.
The transition from our previous ERP system to QAD was remarkably smooth.
An inconvenience arises from the fact that log-in credentials are not synchronized with users' Active Directory (AD) accounts. This lack of integration can be less than ideal.
Helpful, as it provides finance, project accounting, and Supply Chain management processes.
Excellent application. Data can be easily taken out and used in excel for detailed analysis.
Syspro does not include equipment maintenance modules which could help find the maintenance cost of equipment. It becomes mandatory to use a different app and sync with Syspro. This is cumbersome.
With QAD, we were able to address our needs for creating financial statements and operational reports, which were used both internally and externally. However, we experienced limitations in terms of user-friendliness and automation."
QAD is a highly robust software that offers extensive functionality for various accounting tasks.
Unfortunately, the user interface is subpar, and certain tasks, such as shipping and receiving, require excessive manual effort, making them inefficient.
It's been a huge help for us in terms of collecting data from our shop floor and integrating it into our financial records on a daily and monthly basis. This has made it a lot easier for our managers to stay on top of things and spot potential issues before they become big problems.
Definitely the fact that the interface is so user-friendly and easy to navigate. Plus, the layout is really well-designed and makes it a breeze to access every part of the program.
Well, I have to say that the implementation process could be better. It's also a bummer that Syspro doesn't have their own tech support team to help out if anything goes wrong.
Deploying QAD was a breeze, and the transition from our previous ERP system to this one was remarkably smooth.
The transition from our previous ERP system to QAD was remarkably smooth.
An inconvenience arises from the fact that log-in credentials are not synchronized with users' Active Directory (AD) accounts. This lack of integration can be less than ideal.
With QAD, we were able to address our needs for creating financial statements and operational reports, which were used both internally and externally. However, we experienced limitations in terms of user-friendliness and automation."
QAD is a highly robust software that offers extensive functionality for various accounting tasks.
Unfortunately, the user interface is subpar, and certain tasks, such as shipping and receiving, require excessive manual effort, making them inefficient.
Helpful, as it provides finance, project accounting, and Supply Chain management processes.
Excellent application. Data can be easily taken out and used in excel for detailed analysis.
Syspro does not include equipment maintenance modules which could help find the maintenance cost of equipment. It becomes mandatory to use a different app and sync with Syspro. This is cumbersome.
It's been a huge help for us in terms of collecting data from our shop floor and integrating it into our financial records on a daily and monthly basis. This has made it a lot easier for our managers to stay on top of things and spot potential issues before they become big problems.
Definitely the fact that the interface is so user-friendly and easy to navigate. Plus, the layout is really well-designed and makes it a breeze to access every part of the program.
Well, I have to say that the implementation process could be better. It's also a bummer that Syspro doesn't have their own tech support team to help out if anything goes wrong.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of QAD vs. SYSPRO, SYSPRO has 36 user reviews and QAD has 8. The average star rating for SYSPRO is 4.19 while QAD has an average rating of 3.37. SYSPRO has more positive reviews than QAD. Comparing QAD vs. SYSPRO reviews, SYSPRO has stronger overall reviews.
QAD vs. SYSPRO both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Manufacturing/Production Management, Inventory Management, Cash Flow Management, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Asset Management, Accounting Features, Customer Management, Payroll Features, Expense Management, Project Management Features, Resource Management, File Management, Signature Management, Collaboration Tools, Portal Types, Workflow Automation, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Reporting & Analytics, Report Management, Data Management, Data Migration, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Third-Party Integrations, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of QAD vs. SYSPRO, SYSPRO offers more of the most popular features and tools than QAD.
In our pricing comparison of QAD vs. SYSPRO, SYSPRO's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to SYSPRO's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of QAD vs. SYSPRO shows that SYSPRO scores higher in usability for meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. QAD scores higher in ease of use, learning curve, but SYSPRO has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
