In our comparison of McKesson vs. eClinicalWorks, eClinicalWorks is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
It is adaptable, dependable, using it is simple, it has additional features, and client support is good
Very expensive.
N/A
By the time of going live, plenty of installation work remained forcing us to postpone the process by two months. After going live and using it for one year, most of our patients leave as it is full of bugs. Overall, the experience of patients has become very confusing and horrible. It is full of incorrect reminders and its portal is glitched. Investing in this software will cost you your money and patients.
It has many useful features, and if everything really functioned well, it would be extremely simple and customizable to use.
Terrible support-extremely slow response. Bugs are all over the software and very minimal processes (if any) were thought through.
It is adaptable, dependable, using it is simple, it has additional features, and client support is good
Very expensive.
By the time of going live, plenty of installation work remained forcing us to postpone the process by two months. After going live and using it for one year, most of our patients leave as it is full of bugs. Overall, the experience of patients has become very confusing and horrible. It is full of incorrect reminders and its portal is glitched. Investing in this software will cost you your money and patients.
It has many useful features, and if everything really functioned well, it would be extremely simple and customizable to use.
Terrible support-extremely slow response. Bugs are all over the software and very minimal processes (if any) were thought through.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of McKesson vs. eClinicalWorks, eClinicalWorks has 68 user reviews and McKesson has 0. The average star rating for eClinicalWorks is 3.42 while McKesson has an average rating of 0.0. eClinicalWorks has more positive reviews than McKesson. Comparing McKesson vs. eClinicalWorks reviews, eClinicalWorks has stronger overall reviews.
McKesson vs. eClinicalWorks both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Medical Practice Management Features, Patient Management, eRX, Medical Charting, Insurance Claim Management, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Portal Types, Language & Speech, Collaboration Tools, File Management, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Reporting & Analytics, Sync/Refresh, Disaster Recovery, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of McKesson vs. eClinicalWorks, eClinicalWorks offers more of the most popular features and tools than McKesson.
In our pricing comparison of McKesson vs. eClinicalWorks, eClinicalWorks's pricing starts at $499/month and is more affordable compared to eClinicalWorks's starting cost of $499/month.
Our comparison of McKesson vs. eClinicalWorks shows that eClinicalWorks scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. McKesson scores higher in , but eClinicalWorks has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
