In our comparison of M-Files vs. Webdam, M-Files is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
File accessibility through your computers main software, a web browser or mobile app is possible using this software. The way of working on documents are changing and becoming more effective using the aid of digital workflows. Documents can hardly get lost, stolen, or unauthorized access trials as you can get security for your private or company files using M-Files.
Using it is simple, the interface looks modest, perfectly functioning collaboration with MS Office apps, when added to the software, add-ons for M-Files are functioning well, workflows are customizable, M-Files functions on disparate platforms, and through M-Files, you can save and share documents.
An extremely tedious process of locating documents or files-to get the right search outcomes, you have to use the right keyword.
The platform is stable and in helping large companies share assets, it gets the job done. However, it has some fairly annoying upload processes and interface options.
Finding and sharing resources in a large team is eased by Bynder and navigating the rather friendly interface is simple.
Upload options for allocating photo metadata to fields in Bynder or auto-tagging assets based on metadata could be better. Has a frequently confusing “related assets” feature, compared to other systems it is expensive, and the display of file versions could be in a more friendly manner.
I cannot regret using M-files as it is affordable and it the best when it comes to organizing and saving office documents.
Implementing and working with M-Files is simple, it is an extremely quick software, searching for documents is simple, it is an essential software for any office as it is incredibly secure, and it provides a simple method to maintain organization of items and in the correct place in the office.
Extremely terrible client support.
It is a fantastic system.
Lacks a system app.
File accessibility through your computers main software, a web browser or mobile app is possible using this software. The way of working on documents are changing and becoming more effective using the aid of digital workflows. Documents can hardly get lost, stolen, or unauthorized access trials as you can get security for your private or company files using M-Files.
Using it is simple, the interface looks modest, perfectly functioning collaboration with MS Office apps, when added to the software, add-ons for M-Files are functioning well, workflows are customizable, M-Files functions on disparate platforms, and through M-Files, you can save and share documents.
An extremely tedious process of locating documents or files-to get the right search outcomes, you have to use the right keyword.
I cannot regret using M-files as it is affordable and it the best when it comes to organizing and saving office documents.
Implementing and working with M-Files is simple, it is an extremely quick software, searching for documents is simple, it is an essential software for any office as it is incredibly secure, and it provides a simple method to maintain organization of items and in the correct place in the office.
Extremely terrible client support.
The platform is stable and in helping large companies share assets, it gets the job done. However, it has some fairly annoying upload processes and interface options.
Finding and sharing resources in a large team is eased by Bynder and navigating the rather friendly interface is simple.
Upload options for allocating photo metadata to fields in Bynder or auto-tagging assets based on metadata could be better. Has a frequently confusing “related assets” feature, compared to other systems it is expensive, and the display of file versions could be in a more friendly manner.
It is a fantastic system.
Lacks a system app.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of M-Files vs. Webdam, M-Files has 19 user reviews and Webdam has 24. The average star rating for M-Files is 4.42 while Webdam has an average rating of 4. M-Files has more positive reviews than Webdam. Comparing M-Files vs. Webdam reviews, M-Files has stronger overall reviews.
M-Files vs. Webdam both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management System (CMS) Features, File Management, Supported File Formats, Signature Management, Data Management, Supported Content Types, Search Tools, Collaboration Tools, Customizable Items, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Adobe, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of M-Files vs. Webdam, M-Files offers more of the most popular features and tools than Webdam.
In our pricing comparison of M-Files vs. Webdam, Webdam's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Webdam's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of M-Files vs. Webdam shows that Webdam scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin. M-Files scores higher in meets requirements, but Webdam has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
