In our comparison of Greenhouse vs. PeopleFluent, PeopleFluent is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The candidates can be chosen and interviewed taken into consideration through a variety of platforms. The scheduling, knowing the availability, integration, sourcing, interviewing, and flow of the information is very handy and spontaneous. The Candidates’ resumes can be downloaded from other sites.
You need to learn a bit before starting using it. I am still in the learning process. A little more support from the helpdesk will be appreciated.
PeopleFluent is better than any other available ATS I have used when hiring for the past 16 years. It is extremely simple to use and teach a new hiring manager or recruiter to operate it. Also, setting filter options is simple and the support team is awesome.
Simple to learn and teach someone the software.
The process of posting a role has very many steps
The only edge it has against its competitors is the customer chat, which is surprisingly good. They can overtake their competitors if they know the needs of their customers.
The user interface is easy to navigate.
Some beneficial features are available in other software that would have been great here.
An admin is needed to perform daily operations in this LMS, unlike others like redbird, saba, and cornerstone that only need an individual about once every week to run it. It could, however, be suitable for a larger company but currently, software's are optimized. The sole benefit is that they're affordable than others, and that they're restructuring their software and requesting customers to assist them invent their software. It may be later be functional for a manufacturing company.
Conduct individual research depending on your business
Integration is simple
An analyst is required
The candidates can be chosen and interviewed taken into consideration through a variety of platforms. The scheduling, knowing the availability, integration, sourcing, interviewing, and flow of the information is very handy and spontaneous. The Candidates’ resumes can be downloaded from other sites.
You need to learn a bit before starting using it. I am still in the learning process. A little more support from the helpdesk will be appreciated.
The only edge it has against its competitors is the customer chat, which is surprisingly good. They can overtake their competitors if they know the needs of their customers.
The user interface is easy to navigate.
Some beneficial features are available in other software that would have been great here.
PeopleFluent is better than any other available ATS I have used when hiring for the past 16 years. It is extremely simple to use and teach a new hiring manager or recruiter to operate it. Also, setting filter options is simple and the support team is awesome.
Simple to learn and teach someone the software.
The process of posting a role has very many steps
An admin is needed to perform daily operations in this LMS, unlike others like redbird, saba, and cornerstone that only need an individual about once every week to run it. It could, however, be suitable for a larger company but currently, software's are optimized. The sole benefit is that they're affordable than others, and that they're restructuring their software and requesting customers to assist them invent their software. It may be later be functional for a manufacturing company.
Conduct individual research depending on your business
Integration is simple
An analyst is required
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Greenhouse vs. PeopleFluent, Greenhouse has 73 user reviews and PeopleFluent has 19. The average star rating for Greenhouse is 4.54 while PeopleFluent has an average rating of 4.05. Greenhouse has more positive reviews than PeopleFluent. Comparing Greenhouse vs. PeopleFluent reviews, Greenhouse has stronger overall reviews.
Greenhouse vs. PeopleFluent both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Talent Management , Human Resources (HR) Features, Supported Channels, Signature Management, Project Management Features, Data Management, Reporting & Analytics, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of Greenhouse vs. PeopleFluent, PeopleFluent offers more of the most popular features and tools than Greenhouse.
In our pricing comparison of Greenhouse vs. PeopleFluent, PeopleFluent's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to PeopleFluent's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Greenhouse vs. PeopleFluent shows that PeopleFluent scores higher in usability for learning curve, quality of support. Greenhouse scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, ease of admin, but PeopleFluent has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
