In our comparison of FleetOR vs. NexTraq, FleetOR is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The tracking via GPS helps us keep a close eye on the operations of the vehicles. The reports give us the details on loss due to idle time or misrouting, etc. The system is not difficult to use. If needed, the client reps are there to explain things.
Obviously because of the dependability of the software on GPS signal, at times we have had minor delays in tracking information or missed time slots. The system accuracy is high but maybe it can be closer to perfect.
A crucial component of our daily operations is NexTraq. It makes it simple to track not only vehicles and machinery but also personnel. If a problem happens, my sales representative is always available. NexTraq helped us track down and recover two items of equipment that were stolen from us.
Easy to track and sales rep is available always
None
The tracking via GPS helps us keep a close eye on the operations of the vehicles. The reports give us the details on loss due to idle time or misrouting, etc. The system is not difficult to use. If needed, the client reps are there to explain things.
Obviously because of the dependability of the software on GPS signal, at times we have had minor delays in tracking information or missed time slots. The system accuracy is high but maybe it can be closer to perfect.
The asset monitoring platform delivers reports that are both aesthetically pleasing and simple to examine and offers solid basic features. However, because it only offers two daily check-ins and lacks a clear knowledge of the G-force sensitivity that initiates severe events, it is not suited for clearing drivers from non-fault collisions or evaluating driver safety. Furthermore, the platform pings once every 30 seconds, indicating that the data is not real-time.
Basic features are useful, reports are attractive and easy to analyze
Very limited functions, pings always
The tracking via GPS helps us keep a close eye on the operations of the vehicles. The reports give us the details on loss due to idle time or misrouting, etc. The system is not difficult to use. If needed, the client reps are there to explain things.
Obviously because of the dependability of the software on GPS signal, at times we have had minor delays in tracking information or missed time slots. The system accuracy is high but maybe it can be closer to perfect.
The tracking via GPS helps us keep a close eye on the operations of the vehicles. The reports give us the details on loss due to idle time or misrouting, etc. The system is not difficult to use. If needed, the client reps are there to explain things.
Obviously because of the dependability of the software on GPS signal, at times we have had minor delays in tracking information or missed time slots. The system accuracy is high but maybe it can be closer to perfect.
A crucial component of our daily operations is NexTraq. It makes it simple to track not only vehicles and machinery but also personnel. If a problem happens, my sales representative is always available. NexTraq helped us track down and recover two items of equipment that were stolen from us.
Easy to track and sales rep is available always
None
The asset monitoring platform delivers reports that are both aesthetically pleasing and simple to examine and offers solid basic features. However, because it only offers two daily check-ins and lacks a clear knowledge of the G-force sensitivity that initiates severe events, it is not suited for clearing drivers from non-fault collisions or evaluating driver safety. Furthermore, the platform pings once every 30 seconds, indicating that the data is not real-time.
Basic features are useful, reports are attractive and easy to analyze
Very limited functions, pings always
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of FleetOR vs. NexTraq, FleetOR has 4 user reviews and NexTraq has 5. The average star rating for FleetOR is 4.75 while NexTraq has an average rating of 3.4. FleetOR has more positive reviews than NexTraq. Comparing FleetOR vs. NexTraq reviews, FleetOR has stronger overall reviews.
FleetOR vs. NexTraq both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Telematics, Fleet Safety & Quality Assurance, Asset Management, Inventory Management, Appointments/Scheduling, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of FleetOR vs. NexTraq, FleetOR offers more of the most popular features and tools than NexTraq.
In our pricing comparison of FleetOR vs. NexTraq, NexTraq's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to NexTraq's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of FleetOR vs. NexTraq shows that FleetOR scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support, ease of admin. NexTraq scores higher in , but FleetOR has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
