In our comparison of F5 vs. ThreatDown, ThreatDown is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
If you require detailed application security and want to configure your WAF to combat OWASP top 10 threats, F5 ASM (or WAF) is an excellent choice. While there are other vendors in the market offering similar capabilities, F5 ASM stands out in terms of configurability and addressing specific security requirements.
The strength of F5 Application Security Firewall is impressive. With a single click and a license, you can enable WAF on the F5 Load Balancer. F5 offers a unified appliance that combines load balancing and WAF functionalities. This means that while load balancing your application, you don't need to route user requests to separate products. F5 inspects user requests for security purposes during the load balancing process. The configuration options for application security are comprehensive, and the WAF learns the application to effectively block unwanted traffic.
Configuring F5 WAF requires deep knowledge and expertise. The configuration GUI can be complex, leading to potential confusion during the setup process. Additionally, the price of the solution is quite high.
Malware bytes is a great tool to protect your computer and other devices from malicious malware and viruses. Buying the paid version is recommended as it adds an entirely new layer of protection from PUP/PUM files.
I don’t have any issue or problem with this program.
F5 BIG-IP Advanced Web Application Firewall addresses our organization's need for protecting and load balancing all external applications. By leveraging the WAF functionality, we can secure every application that is exposed to the outside. The combination of WAF and load balancing features provides significant benefits in terms of security and performance."
One of the standout features is the automatic updating of signatures, relieving the concern of manual updates. The bot defense capability is highly valuable, and the ability to easily identify blocked URLs from the logs is a great advantage.
The user interface could be improved to enhance user-friendliness. F5 should invest in refining the interface for a more intuitive and user-friendly experience.
It is the best option for protecting all your computer systems from all kinds of threats and malware.
It has the capability to save multiple computers at different times. Protection is promised when you use Malwarebytes.
The dashboard seems a bit clunky. But once learned, it is a breeze.
If you require detailed application security and want to configure your WAF to combat OWASP top 10 threats, F5 ASM (or WAF) is an excellent choice. While there are other vendors in the market offering similar capabilities, F5 ASM stands out in terms of configurability and addressing specific security requirements.
The strength of F5 Application Security Firewall is impressive. With a single click and a license, you can enable WAF on the F5 Load Balancer. F5 offers a unified appliance that combines load balancing and WAF functionalities. This means that while load balancing your application, you don't need to route user requests to separate products. F5 inspects user requests for security purposes during the load balancing process. The configuration options for application security are comprehensive, and the WAF learns the application to effectively block unwanted traffic.
Configuring F5 WAF requires deep knowledge and expertise. The configuration GUI can be complex, leading to potential confusion during the setup process. Additionally, the price of the solution is quite high.
F5 BIG-IP Advanced Web Application Firewall addresses our organization's need for protecting and load balancing all external applications. By leveraging the WAF functionality, we can secure every application that is exposed to the outside. The combination of WAF and load balancing features provides significant benefits in terms of security and performance."
One of the standout features is the automatic updating of signatures, relieving the concern of manual updates. The bot defense capability is highly valuable, and the ability to easily identify blocked URLs from the logs is a great advantage.
The user interface could be improved to enhance user-friendliness. F5 should invest in refining the interface for a more intuitive and user-friendly experience.
Malware bytes is a great tool to protect your computer and other devices from malicious malware and viruses. Buying the paid version is recommended as it adds an entirely new layer of protection from PUP/PUM files.
I don’t have any issue or problem with this program.
It is the best option for protecting all your computer systems from all kinds of threats and malware.
It has the capability to save multiple computers at different times. Protection is promised when you use Malwarebytes.
The dashboard seems a bit clunky. But once learned, it is a breeze.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of F5 vs. ThreatDown, F5 has 6 user reviews and ThreatDown has 122. The average star rating for F5 is 4.83 while ThreatDown has an average rating of 4.69. F5 has more positive reviews than ThreatDown. Comparing F5 vs. ThreatDown reviews, F5 has stronger overall reviews.
F5 vs. ThreatDown both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Network Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Application Management, Disaster Recovery, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Third-Party Integrations, Compliance Accreditations, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of F5 vs. ThreatDown, ThreatDown offers more of the most popular features and tools than F5.
In our pricing comparison of F5 vs. ThreatDown, ThreatDown's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatDown's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of F5 vs. ThreatDown shows that ThreatDown scores higher in usability for meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support. F5 scores higher in ease of use, ease of admin, but ThreatDown has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
