In our comparison of Epic vs. Greenway Health, Greenway Health is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The enhanced features for research in this system (e.g. the ability to get to records from other agencies which wok with EPIC) are the reason why we’re continuously using it. Regarding research, invoicing and compliance, this software has been of great help.
The features that improve the ability to perform research in an educational hospital are present in EPIC. To make sure that the right fees are passed to the research study/insurance, there are methods to generate lists of patients, monitor billing, and get tailored alerts. Running reports after determining and monitoring participation and advancement of research is simple.
Some research aspects are non-intuitive. Picking up a few back end reporting systems takes time due to the learning curve present.
I had to personally learn the system as we didn’t have a super user in my team. In the absence of a super user, a simpler method to initiate education is required. They have a very personable, well-trained, GRS team who are proficient communicators.
All the fundamentals pertaining to EHR’s are in this software, accessing and following patients is simple as is maneuvering. Its connection with external resources/providers is much better than other systems.
It is quite difficult to generate reports, the options are very many, nailing down a few parts wanted in a report is hard, a time consuming customization process, and subpar client service.
Epic Care has a relevant interface suited for the clinical environment and a set up that is rather simple with the new layout with tab sections for the clinician. It coordinates the work and keeps continuity in the facility. Also, it helps to find out how much work still needs to be completed. It is also an important development that our institution is employing a new version which would create a flawless evenness between outpatient and inpatient.
There are no cons as such but a suggestion that EPIC should develop new ways that clinicians can come out with that would help them showcase their own unique skills based on their specialty. It may look difficult in the beginning. But, this way there will be an improvement in clinical efficiency.
This system is terrible.
None.
Has a terrible UI-very many clicks are required, lacks an accurate click functionality, and you can’t use the entire window as the document browser doesn’t expand.
The enhanced features for research in this system (e.g. the ability to get to records from other agencies which wok with EPIC) are the reason why we’re continuously using it. Regarding research, invoicing and compliance, this software has been of great help.
The features that improve the ability to perform research in an educational hospital are present in EPIC. To make sure that the right fees are passed to the research study/insurance, there are methods to generate lists of patients, monitor billing, and get tailored alerts. Running reports after determining and monitoring participation and advancement of research is simple.
Some research aspects are non-intuitive. Picking up a few back end reporting systems takes time due to the learning curve present.
Epic Care has a relevant interface suited for the clinical environment and a set up that is rather simple with the new layout with tab sections for the clinician. It coordinates the work and keeps continuity in the facility. Also, it helps to find out how much work still needs to be completed. It is also an important development that our institution is employing a new version which would create a flawless evenness between outpatient and inpatient.
There are no cons as such but a suggestion that EPIC should develop new ways that clinicians can come out with that would help them showcase their own unique skills based on their specialty. It may look difficult in the beginning. But, this way there will be an improvement in clinical efficiency.
I had to personally learn the system as we didn’t have a super user in my team. In the absence of a super user, a simpler method to initiate education is required. They have a very personable, well-trained, GRS team who are proficient communicators.
All the fundamentals pertaining to EHR’s are in this software, accessing and following patients is simple as is maneuvering. Its connection with external resources/providers is much better than other systems.
It is quite difficult to generate reports, the options are very many, nailing down a few parts wanted in a report is hard, a time consuming customization process, and subpar client service.
This system is terrible.
None.
Has a terrible UI-very many clicks are required, lacks an accurate click functionality, and you can’t use the entire window as the document browser doesn’t expand.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Epic vs. Greenway Health, Epic has 71 user reviews and Greenway Health has 21. The average star rating for Epic is 4.52 while Greenway Health has an average rating of 4.19. Epic has more positive reviews than Greenway Health. Comparing Epic vs. Greenway Health reviews, Epic has stronger overall reviews.
Epic vs. Greenway Health both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Medical Practice Management Features, Patient Management, eRX, Medical Charting, Laboratory Management, Insurance Claim Management, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Portal Types, Customizable Items, Document Management, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Medical Specialties. In our feature comparison of Epic vs. Greenway Health, Epic offers more of the most popular features and tools than Greenway Health.
In our pricing comparison of Epic vs. Greenway Health, Greenway Health's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Greenway Health's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Epic vs. Greenway Health shows that Greenway Health scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, steup & support. Epic scores higher in learning curve, quality of support, ease of admin, but Greenway Health has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
