In our comparison of CyberArk vs. Okta, Okta is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
For the PAS application, its scalability and redundancy options are outstanding. Adding another server behind the load balancer is a breeze. Regarding the EPM application, its high adjustability and flexibility make it suitable for a wide range of uses.
It has seamlessly transitioned into our production and infrastructure workflows after strong adoption by our R&D team.
PAS Application: The CPM component lacks easy scalability. Performance issues arise with large deployments. Requests may fail or not execute with a large pool of data.
Okta is the future for businesses and companies based on my overall experience.
The ability to store all the necessary apps for work in one place.
Since I haven't been using it for a long time, I haven't encountered any issues yet.
The product effectively solves the challenge of integrating Cyberark with internal applications, allowing for session monitoring and identifying any unauthorized activity. It also facilitates onboarding of accounts and safes to streamline server administration tasks within the tool.
One of the standout features I like is the Privileged Session Manager (PSM) which allows monitoring of user connectivity in the backend. Additionally, the Central Policy Manager (CPM) is excellent for handling password management across required and pre-defined platforms.
One potential drawback is that beginners may find it challenging to start working with and learning the tool. However, once familiarized, it offers a great platform for development and exploration.
So far, I'm quite pleased with the authentication and verification processes. They seem robust and reliable.
My experience has been quite positive.
None
For the PAS application, its scalability and redundancy options are outstanding. Adding another server behind the load balancer is a breeze. Regarding the EPM application, its high adjustability and flexibility make it suitable for a wide range of uses.
It has seamlessly transitioned into our production and infrastructure workflows after strong adoption by our R&D team.
PAS Application: The CPM component lacks easy scalability. Performance issues arise with large deployments. Requests may fail or not execute with a large pool of data.
The product effectively solves the challenge of integrating Cyberark with internal applications, allowing for session monitoring and identifying any unauthorized activity. It also facilitates onboarding of accounts and safes to streamline server administration tasks within the tool.
One of the standout features I like is the Privileged Session Manager (PSM) which allows monitoring of user connectivity in the backend. Additionally, the Central Policy Manager (CPM) is excellent for handling password management across required and pre-defined platforms.
One potential drawback is that beginners may find it challenging to start working with and learning the tool. However, once familiarized, it offers a great platform for development and exploration.
Okta is the future for businesses and companies based on my overall experience.
The ability to store all the necessary apps for work in one place.
Since I haven't been using it for a long time, I haven't encountered any issues yet.
So far, I'm quite pleased with the authentication and verification processes. They seem robust and reliable.
My experience has been quite positive.
None
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of CyberArk vs. Okta, Okta has 11 user reviews and CyberArk has 9. The average star rating for Okta is 4.45 while CyberArk has an average rating of 4.22. Okta has more positive reviews than CyberArk. Comparing CyberArk vs. Okta reviews, Okta has stronger overall reviews.
CyberArk vs. Okta both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Device Management, Network Management, Reporting & Analytics, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Third-Party Integrations, Data Management, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options. In our feature comparison of CyberArk vs. Okta, Okta offers more of the most popular features and tools than CyberArk.
In our pricing comparison of CyberArk vs. Okta, Okta's pricing starts at $23/month and is more affordable compared to Okta's starting cost of $23/month.
Our comparison of CyberArk vs. Okta shows that Okta scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. CyberArk scores higher in meets requirements, but Okta has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
