In our comparison of ChartLogic vs. Epic, Epic is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Nice support.
Setup, processing, editing, and medications through electronics is easy.
Sometimes there are a few connectivity issues.
The enhanced features for research in this system (e.g. the ability to get to records from other agencies which wok with EPIC) are the reason why we’re continuously using it. Regarding research, invoicing and compliance, this software has been of great help.
The features that improve the ability to perform research in an educational hospital are present in EPIC. To make sure that the right fees are passed to the research study/insurance, there are methods to generate lists of patients, monitor billing, and get tailored alerts. Running reports after determining and monitoring participation and advancement of research is simple.
Some research aspects are non-intuitive. Picking up a few back end reporting systems takes time due to the learning curve present.
The program is user-friendly, intuitive, and packed with a lot of amazing features. I like that it lets me use smart fields, templates, and more. It also helps me save time when doing charting tasks as some of the template fields are already filled automatically.
E-Prescribing is terrible. It requires a lot of steps since this part of the program is not intuitive.
Epic Care has a relevant interface suited for the clinical environment and a set up that is rather simple with the new layout with tab sections for the clinician. It coordinates the work and keeps continuity in the facility. Also, it helps to find out how much work still needs to be completed. It is also an important development that our institution is employing a new version which would create a flawless evenness between outpatient and inpatient.
There are no cons as such but a suggestion that EPIC should develop new ways that clinicians can come out with that would help them showcase their own unique skills based on their specialty. It may look difficult in the beginning. But, this way there will be an improvement in clinical efficiency.
Nice support.
Setup, processing, editing, and medications through electronics is easy.
Sometimes there are a few connectivity issues.
The program is user-friendly, intuitive, and packed with a lot of amazing features. I like that it lets me use smart fields, templates, and more. It also helps me save time when doing charting tasks as some of the template fields are already filled automatically.
E-Prescribing is terrible. It requires a lot of steps since this part of the program is not intuitive.
The enhanced features for research in this system (e.g. the ability to get to records from other agencies which wok with EPIC) are the reason why we’re continuously using it. Regarding research, invoicing and compliance, this software has been of great help.
The features that improve the ability to perform research in an educational hospital are present in EPIC. To make sure that the right fees are passed to the research study/insurance, there are methods to generate lists of patients, monitor billing, and get tailored alerts. Running reports after determining and monitoring participation and advancement of research is simple.
Some research aspects are non-intuitive. Picking up a few back end reporting systems takes time due to the learning curve present.
Epic Care has a relevant interface suited for the clinical environment and a set up that is rather simple with the new layout with tab sections for the clinician. It coordinates the work and keeps continuity in the facility. Also, it helps to find out how much work still needs to be completed. It is also an important development that our institution is employing a new version which would create a flawless evenness between outpatient and inpatient.
There are no cons as such but a suggestion that EPIC should develop new ways that clinicians can come out with that would help them showcase their own unique skills based on their specialty. It may look difficult in the beginning. But, this way there will be an improvement in clinical efficiency.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of ChartLogic vs. Epic, Epic has 75 user reviews and ChartLogic has 8. The average star rating for Epic is 4.49 while ChartLogic has an average rating of 3.12. Epic has more positive reviews than ChartLogic. Comparing ChartLogic vs. Epic reviews, Epic has stronger overall reviews.
ChartLogic vs. Epic both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Medical Practice Management Features, Patient Management, eRX, Medical Charting, Laboratory Management, Insurance Claim Management, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Portal Types, Customizable Items, File Management, Appointments/Scheduling, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of ChartLogic vs. Epic, ChartLogic offers more of the most popular features and tools than Epic.
In our pricing comparison of ChartLogic vs. Epic, Epic's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Epic's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of ChartLogic vs. Epic shows that Epic scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, quality of support, ease of admin. ChartLogic scores higher in meets requirements, setup & support, but Epic has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
