In our comparison of Canto vs. FileHold, Canto is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
My little team enjoyed the benefits of Canto because it has helped us save time and access the resources we need. Prior to Canto, we outsourced a lot of work and had to comb through email to identify several Google Drives, WeTransfers, and Dropboxes in order to get the materials we required. This was cumbersome and ineffective. Canto now lets me choose who sees what and what is preserved, plus it's a simple application to navigate. We gain from Canto's solution to the problem of disorganized media files since it helps us identify the materials we need faster and more easily.
Easy to organize and store all media files in one place, centralized location, control over who sees and what is saved, and saves time and effort
None
The user-friendliness of FileHold and its seamless integration with other software programs we commonly use have been major advantages. It has streamlined our approval process and significantly improved our workflow efficiency. I particularly appreciate how convenient it is to use, especially for a business of our size. Additionally, creating and accessing documents is a breeze, and the ability to create workflows has saved us a lot of time.
It serves as a centralized platform that allows me to efficiently manage important business documents. FileHold has been instrumental in implementing effective document control and transitioning to a paperless office. I particularly appreciate how FileHold saves me time by organizing everything in the cloud, making it easier to locate files.
Occasionally, there may be some lag during file transfers, but overall, it is still the best solution for saving time.
The app integrations have been key for us.
All assets are easier to find now
Cropping can cause distortion in images and I don't care for the general look of the library
It effortlessly converts paper documents into PDF format through scanning, allowing us to securely store them in the cloud. Serving as a centralized platform, it enables us to manage critical business documents with ease.
Setting up this application is a breeze and it seamlessly integrates into our workflow. The pricing is negotiable, and their customer support is not only friendly but also quick to respond, particularly when faced with technical issues.
Comparatively higher price point when compared to alternative options.
My little team enjoyed the benefits of Canto because it has helped us save time and access the resources we need. Prior to Canto, we outsourced a lot of work and had to comb through email to identify several Google Drives, WeTransfers, and Dropboxes in order to get the materials we required. This was cumbersome and ineffective. Canto now lets me choose who sees what and what is preserved, plus it's a simple application to navigate. We gain from Canto's solution to the problem of disorganized media files since it helps us identify the materials we need faster and more easily.
Easy to organize and store all media files in one place, centralized location, control over who sees and what is saved, and saves time and effort
None
The app integrations have been key for us.
All assets are easier to find now
Cropping can cause distortion in images and I don't care for the general look of the library
The user-friendliness of FileHold and its seamless integration with other software programs we commonly use have been major advantages. It has streamlined our approval process and significantly improved our workflow efficiency. I particularly appreciate how convenient it is to use, especially for a business of our size. Additionally, creating and accessing documents is a breeze, and the ability to create workflows has saved us a lot of time.
It serves as a centralized platform that allows me to efficiently manage important business documents. FileHold has been instrumental in implementing effective document control and transitioning to a paperless office. I particularly appreciate how FileHold saves me time by organizing everything in the cloud, making it easier to locate files.
Occasionally, there may be some lag during file transfers, but overall, it is still the best solution for saving time.
It effortlessly converts paper documents into PDF format through scanning, allowing us to securely store them in the cloud. Serving as a centralized platform, it enables us to manage critical business documents with ease.
Setting up this application is a breeze and it seamlessly integrates into our workflow. The pricing is negotiable, and their customer support is not only friendly but also quick to respond, particularly when faced with technical issues.
Comparatively higher price point when compared to alternative options.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Canto vs. FileHold, FileHold has 11 user reviews and Canto has 16. The average star rating for FileHold is 4.36 while Canto has an average rating of 4.12. FileHold has more positive reviews than Canto. Comparing Canto vs. FileHold reviews, FileHold has stronger overall reviews.
Canto vs. FileHold both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management System (CMS) Features, File Management, Supported File Formats, Signature Management, Data Management, Supported Content Types, Search Tools, Customizable Items, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Compliance Accreditations, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Canto vs. FileHold, Canto offers more of the most popular features and tools than FileHold.
In our pricing comparison of Canto vs. FileHold, FileHold's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to FileHold's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Canto vs. FileHold shows that Canto scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support. FileHold scores higher in setup & support, ease of admin, but Canto has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
