Built for Teams vs. Gusto: Which is Best? - Wheelhouse

Built for Teams vs. Gusto: Which is Best?

Built for Teams vs. Gusto Best Overall: Gusto

In our comparison of Built for Teams vs. Gusto, Gusto is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.

Quick Info

Built for Teams Quick Info
WH Score:
8.4
Pricing Score:
7.8
Feature Score:
7.8
Usability Score:
7.7
Company Size:Small Business, Mid Market
Platforms:
Gusto Quick Info
WH Score:
9.2
Pricing Score:
8.5
Feature Score:
8.2
Usability Score:
8.7
Company Size:All Sizes
Platforms:

Pricing

Built for Teams Pricing
Price Range
Contact Us

* Vendor does not share prices.

Gusto Pricing
Simple
$6
per employee / per month
Plus
$12
per employee / per month
Premium
Contact Us

Features

Built for Teams Features
  • Employee Records
  • Employee Profiling
  • Benefits Administration
  • Job Posting
  • Applicant Tracking System (ATS)
  • Pre-Hire Checklist
  • Talent Pools
  • Resume Management
  • Candidate Management
  • Candidate Scorecards
  • Succession Planning
  • Paystubs
  • Skill Management
  • Performance Management
  • Leadership Management
Gusto Features
  • Employee Records
  • Employee Profiling
  • Benefits Administration
  • Job Posting
  • Applicant Tracking System (ATS)
  • Pre-Hire Checklist
  • Talent Pools
  • Resume Management
  • Candidate Management
  • Candidate Scorecards
  • Succession Planning
  • Paystubs
  • Skill Management
  • Performance Management
  • Leadership Management

Pros & Cons

Built for Teams Pros & Cons
Pros
  • The user-friendly experience of the product is highly appreciated
  • It ensures that navigating and using the system is intuitive and straightforward.
Cons
  • I don't have any specific dislikes about the system
  • It seems to meet my needs effectively.
Gusto Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Using it is simple, and the incorporations with other systems e.g
  • QB, TurboTax, etc
  • are numerous.
Cons
  • The interface is difficult to use at times.

Reviews

Built for Teams Reviews
Top Favorable Review
C
Catherine
Reviewed on Jul 2, 2021

The product solves the problem of efficiently tracking and managing my time off and vacation days at work. It provides a reliable system to keep track of my allocated time off, enabling me to plan and utilize my vacation days effectively. This helps ensure that I can maintain a healthy work-life balance and make the most of my time off.

The user-friendly experience of the product is highly appreciated. It ensures that navigating and using the system is intuitive and straightforward.

I don't have any specific dislikes about the system. It seems to meet my needs effectively.

Top Critical Review
C
Catherine
Reviewed on Jul 2, 2021

The product solves the problem of efficiently tracking and managing my time off and vacation days at work. It provides a reliable system to keep track of my allocated time off, enabling me to plan and utilize my vacation days effectively. This helps ensure that I can maintain a healthy work-life balance and make the most of my time off.

The user-friendly experience of the product is highly appreciated. It ensures that navigating and using the system is intuitive and straightforward.

I don't have any specific dislikes about the system. It seems to meet my needs effectively.

Gusto Reviews
Top Favorable Review
S
Stephen
Reviewed on Jul 2, 2021

Operating it is extremely simple, they have great client care, and its value for money is good.

Using it is simple, and the incorporations with other systems e.g. QB, TurboTax, etc. are numerous.

Small organizations find it quite pricey and client care response is slow.

Top Critical Review
R
Ruth
Reviewed on Jul 2, 2021

Simple entering of payroll, paying and monitoring. Payroll accounting is eased by collaboration with Xero and QB.

The interface is difficult to use at times

Alternatives

Built for Teams Alternatives
Gusto Alternatives
Add to Compare

Add suggested to comparison

Built for Teams vs. Gusto: Detailed Comparison

Built for Teams vs. Gusto Top Ratings & Reviews: Built for Teams

In our rating and review comparison of Built for Teams vs. Gusto, Built for Teams has 20 user reviews and Gusto has 87. The average star rating for Built for Teams is 4.55 while Gusto has an average rating of 4.52. Built for Teams has more positive reviews than Gusto. Comparing Built for Teams vs. Gusto reviews, Built for Teams has stronger overall reviews.

Built for Teams vs. Gusto Best Features & Functionality: Gusto

Built for Teams vs. Gusto both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Human Resources (HR) Features, Talent Management , Workforce Optimization, Payroll Features, Attendance Management, Reporting & Analytics, Tax Management, Supported Tax Forms, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Clock-In/Clock-Out Options, Customizable Items, Report Management, Portal Types, Document Management, Signature Management, Collaboration Tools, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Workflow Automation, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Third-Party Integrations, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Payment Options, Supported Devices/Hardware. In our feature comparison of Built for Teams vs. Gusto, Gusto offers more of the most popular features and tools than Built for Teams.

Built for Teams vs. Gusto Best Pricing: Gusto

In our pricing comparison of Built for Teams vs. Gusto, Gusto's pricing starts at $6/month and is more affordable compared to Gusto's starting cost of $6/month.

Built for Teams vs. Gusto Best Usability: Gusto

Our comparison of Built for Teams vs. Gusto shows that Gusto scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support. Built for Teams scores higher in ease of admin, but Gusto has the best scores overall for system usability.

The right software for your business

Get your personalized recommendations now.