In our comparison of Aptean vs. QAD, Aptean is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Our vitamin and supplement manufacturing company was looking for software that was precise to our requirements. I, as the company's CFO, was the person mandated with the research process. After a period of searching I finally settled on ProcessPro. We acquired it in 2004 and we've never had any regrets for picking it. It has been very vital in the growth of our business. It is very comprehensive, simple to use, versatile, and the customer support team is very fair, helpful, diligent, and resourceful. Further, it is capable of exporting data for management reporting, it has very useful process manufacturing and inventory management features which have increased the efficiency of our operations.
We have been able to have better accuracy and controls in customer service and productivity after recently implementing the Automated Warehouse System.
Lastly, our counts and order fulfilment are more accurate, inventory is presently real-time, and customer service percentage has greatly improved thanks to this software.
Deploying QAD was a breeze, and the transition from our previous ERP system to this one was remarkably smooth.
The transition from our previous ERP system to QAD was remarkably smooth.
An inconvenience arises from the fact that log-in credentials are not synchronized with users' Active Directory (AD) accounts. This lack of integration can be less than ideal.
Workwise is the second-simplest and robust software compared to the seven different ERP systems I have used in my career.
Enhanced online support and software upgrades, the prompt response in case of emergencies, wonderful modules range, and extensive functional flexibility.
Non-effective printing and pdf use without using third-party support, occasionally slow customer response, and partial testing of patches and updates seem to cause issues into the mix.
With QAD, we were able to address our needs for creating financial statements and operational reports, which were used both internally and externally. However, we experienced limitations in terms of user-friendliness and automation."
QAD is a highly robust software that offers extensive functionality for various accounting tasks.
Unfortunately, the user interface is subpar, and certain tasks, such as shipping and receiving, require excessive manual effort, making them inefficient.
Our vitamin and supplement manufacturing company was looking for software that was precise to our requirements. I, as the company's CFO, was the person mandated with the research process. After a period of searching I finally settled on ProcessPro. We acquired it in 2004 and we've never had any regrets for picking it. It has been very vital in the growth of our business. It is very comprehensive, simple to use, versatile, and the customer support team is very fair, helpful, diligent, and resourceful. Further, it is capable of exporting data for management reporting, it has very useful process manufacturing and inventory management features which have increased the efficiency of our operations.
We have been able to have better accuracy and controls in customer service and productivity after recently implementing the Automated Warehouse System.
Lastly, our counts and order fulfilment are more accurate, inventory is presently real-time, and customer service percentage has greatly improved thanks to this software.
Workwise is the second-simplest and robust software compared to the seven different ERP systems I have used in my career.
Enhanced online support and software upgrades, the prompt response in case of emergencies, wonderful modules range, and extensive functional flexibility.
Non-effective printing and pdf use without using third-party support, occasionally slow customer response, and partial testing of patches and updates seem to cause issues into the mix.
Deploying QAD was a breeze, and the transition from our previous ERP system to this one was remarkably smooth.
The transition from our previous ERP system to QAD was remarkably smooth.
An inconvenience arises from the fact that log-in credentials are not synchronized with users' Active Directory (AD) accounts. This lack of integration can be less than ideal.
With QAD, we were able to address our needs for creating financial statements and operational reports, which were used both internally and externally. However, we experienced limitations in terms of user-friendliness and automation."
QAD is a highly robust software that offers extensive functionality for various accounting tasks.
Unfortunately, the user interface is subpar, and certain tasks, such as shipping and receiving, require excessive manual effort, making them inefficient.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Aptean vs. QAD, Aptean has 58 user reviews and QAD has 8. The average star rating for Aptean is 4.36 while QAD has an average rating of 3.37. Aptean has more positive reviews than QAD. Comparing Aptean vs. QAD reviews, Aptean has stronger overall reviews.
Aptean vs. QAD both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Manufacturing/Production Management, Inventory Management, Cash Flow Management, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Asset Management, Customer Management, Accounting Features, Data Management, Data Migration, Lead Management, Report Management, Reporting & Analytics, Shipping & Logistics, Expense Management, Project Management Features, File Management, Collaboration Tools, Portal Types, Workflow Automation, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Customizable Items, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Identity and Access Management (IAM), After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Aptean vs. QAD, Aptean offers more of the most popular features and tools than QAD.
In our pricing comparison of Aptean vs. QAD, QAD's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to QAD's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Aptean vs. QAD shows that Aptean scores higher in usability for setup & support, quality of support. QAD scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin, but Aptean has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
