In our comparison of ApplicantStack vs. JazzHR, JazzHR is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
The systems organizational design for assessing applicants.
Monitoring data is hard due to the two disparate hiring modules.
Using JazzHR has been helpful so far, they also are very eager at answering questions when we encountered issues.
JazzHR is a trustworthy system. Its ease of use and the ability to communicate with your team using the chat-like feature makes it the perfect formula for an ideal workflow. It might not sound that great, but communication is one of the most critical elements for a small HR team.
A mobile app would make it more convenient. I heard that there would be a feature that gives you options for access levels in future updates; it would be a great and helpful addition.
Fantastic! Simple to work with and trace previous candidates.
Covers a wide base of applicants and compared to former hiring systems, this system gives us better feedback.
It doesn’t download the applicants straight into ADP.
JazzHR has helped us improve our ability to track and manage applicants and create a consistent experience about the candidate through the entire process.
It has the features and functionality of many bigger and expensive options available with added advantage of affordable prices for smaller companies. The careers page, candidate texting and unlimited users with commitment every month were the main attractions for us as our company was new to using an ATS and did not want a long term commitment for the time being.
The major con right now is the reports which are not easy to navigate. It is also a fact that we have not learnt much about it yet and still use customized reports to get the information required. I don't find any other con as such so far.
The systems organizational design for assessing applicants.
Monitoring data is hard due to the two disparate hiring modules.
Fantastic! Simple to work with and trace previous candidates.
Covers a wide base of applicants and compared to former hiring systems, this system gives us better feedback.
It doesn’t download the applicants straight into ADP.
Using JazzHR has been helpful so far, they also are very eager at answering questions when we encountered issues.
JazzHR is a trustworthy system. Its ease of use and the ability to communicate with your team using the chat-like feature makes it the perfect formula for an ideal workflow. It might not sound that great, but communication is one of the most critical elements for a small HR team.
A mobile app would make it more convenient. I heard that there would be a feature that gives you options for access levels in future updates; it would be a great and helpful addition.
JazzHR has helped us improve our ability to track and manage applicants and create a consistent experience about the candidate through the entire process.
It has the features and functionality of many bigger and expensive options available with added advantage of affordable prices for smaller companies. The careers page, candidate texting and unlimited users with commitment every month were the main attractions for us as our company was new to using an ATS and did not want a long term commitment for the time being.
The major con right now is the reports which are not easy to navigate. It is also a fact that we have not learnt much about it yet and still use customized reports to get the information required. I don't find any other con as such so far.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of ApplicantStack vs. JazzHR, JazzHR has 107 user reviews and ApplicantStack has 350. The average star rating for JazzHR is 4.41 while ApplicantStack has an average rating of 4.37. JazzHR has more positive reviews than ApplicantStack. Comparing ApplicantStack vs. JazzHR reviews, JazzHR has stronger overall reviews.
ApplicantStack vs. JazzHR both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Talent Management , Human Resources (HR) Features, Supported Channels, Customizable Items, Portal Types, Document Management, Signature Management, Reminders/Alerts, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of ApplicantStack vs. JazzHR, JazzHR offers more of the most popular features and tools than ApplicantStack.
In our pricing comparison of ApplicantStack vs. JazzHR, JazzHR's pricing starts at Free/month and is more affordable compared to JazzHR's starting cost of Free/month.
Our comparison of ApplicantStack vs. JazzHR shows that JazzHR scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, quality of support, ease of admin. ApplicantStack scores higher in learning curve, setup & support, but JazzHR has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
