In our comparison of Alfresco vs. Webdam, Alfresco is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The product excels in managing a vast archive of documents spanning over 25 years. It significantly simplifies document approval processes, facilitates records conversion, and enables efficient archival of older documents.
Effective Document Workflow Functionality. User-Friendly Document Metadata Management. Developer and End-User Friendly Interface
Increasing Complexity of Local Installation Post-Version 5.1.1.4. Customization Deployment Challenges in Alfresco
The platform is stable and in helping large companies share assets, it gets the job done. However, it has some fairly annoying upload processes and interface options.
Finding and sharing resources in a large team is eased by Bynder and navigating the rather friendly interface is simple.
Upload options for allocating photo metadata to fields in Bynder or auto-tagging assets based on metadata could be better. Has a frequently confusing “related assets” feature, compared to other systems it is expensive, and the display of file versions could be in a more friendly manner.
It has great customization features, it is compatible with multiple types of files, work flow options are great, it is easy to search for documents, the ability to customize your summary of that project, offering visuals to members thanks to the setting of the dashboard on every site, and the ability to know if the project is website based courtesy of the live browser frame.
The interface could be better, unlocking all the functionality and features available to you takes the usability some time.
It is a fantastic system.
Lacks a system app.
The product excels in managing a vast archive of documents spanning over 25 years. It significantly simplifies document approval processes, facilitates records conversion, and enables efficient archival of older documents.
Effective Document Workflow Functionality. User-Friendly Document Metadata Management. Developer and End-User Friendly Interface
Increasing Complexity of Local Installation Post-Version 5.1.1.4. Customization Deployment Challenges in Alfresco
It has great customization features, it is compatible with multiple types of files, work flow options are great, it is easy to search for documents, the ability to customize your summary of that project, offering visuals to members thanks to the setting of the dashboard on every site, and the ability to know if the project is website based courtesy of the live browser frame.
The interface could be better, unlocking all the functionality and features available to you takes the usability some time.
The platform is stable and in helping large companies share assets, it gets the job done. However, it has some fairly annoying upload processes and interface options.
Finding and sharing resources in a large team is eased by Bynder and navigating the rather friendly interface is simple.
Upload options for allocating photo metadata to fields in Bynder or auto-tagging assets based on metadata could be better. Has a frequently confusing “related assets” feature, compared to other systems it is expensive, and the display of file versions could be in a more friendly manner.
It is a fantastic system.
Lacks a system app.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Alfresco vs. Webdam, Alfresco has 13 user reviews and Webdam has 24. The average star rating for Alfresco is 4.38 while Webdam has an average rating of 4. Alfresco has more positive reviews than Webdam. Comparing Alfresco vs. Webdam reviews, Alfresco has stronger overall reviews.
Alfresco vs. Webdam both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management System (CMS) Features, File Management, Supported File Formats, Signature Management, Data Management, Supported Content Types, Search Tools, Collaboration Tools, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365. In our feature comparison of Alfresco vs. Webdam, Alfresco offers more of the most popular features and tools than Webdam.
In our pricing comparison of Alfresco vs. Webdam, Webdam's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Webdam's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Alfresco vs. Webdam shows that Webdam scores higher in usability for ease of use, setup & support, ease of admin. Alfresco scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support, but Webdam has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
