In our comparison of Alfresco vs. Kontent.ai, Alfresco is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The product excels in managing a vast archive of documents spanning over 25 years. It significantly simplifies document approval processes, facilitates records conversion, and enables efficient archival of older documents.
Effective Document Workflow Functionality. User-Friendly Document Metadata Management. Developer and End-User Friendly Interface
Increasing Complexity of Local Installation Post-Version 5.1.1.4. Customization Deployment Challenges in Alfresco
Excellent customization. A good number of content pages on our website (Almost 400)
Changes to the site is difficult as it is highly customized. Back-end data needs to be more organized to avoid the use of multiple reports to get relevant information.
It has great customization features, it is compatible with multiple types of files, work flow options are great, it is easy to search for documents, the ability to customize your summary of that project, offering visuals to members thanks to the setting of the dashboard on every site, and the ability to know if the project is website based courtesy of the live browser frame.
The interface could be better, unlocking all the functionality and features available to you takes the usability some time.
Easy to learn and easy to train the staff.
It is simple. It helps you customize your navigation based on content structure. Very intuitive. Helps assign roles to the areas of the site. It provides access to users to use specific sections only required for their updates.
I guess Kenticos wants to get everything done through CMS which is not advisable.
The product excels in managing a vast archive of documents spanning over 25 years. It significantly simplifies document approval processes, facilitates records conversion, and enables efficient archival of older documents.
Effective Document Workflow Functionality. User-Friendly Document Metadata Management. Developer and End-User Friendly Interface
Increasing Complexity of Local Installation Post-Version 5.1.1.4. Customization Deployment Challenges in Alfresco
It has great customization features, it is compatible with multiple types of files, work flow options are great, it is easy to search for documents, the ability to customize your summary of that project, offering visuals to members thanks to the setting of the dashboard on every site, and the ability to know if the project is website based courtesy of the live browser frame.
The interface could be better, unlocking all the functionality and features available to you takes the usability some time.
Excellent customization. A good number of content pages on our website (Almost 400)
Changes to the site is difficult as it is highly customized. Back-end data needs to be more organized to avoid the use of multiple reports to get relevant information.
Easy to learn and easy to train the staff.
It is simple. It helps you customize your navigation based on content structure. Very intuitive. Helps assign roles to the areas of the site. It provides access to users to use specific sections only required for their updates.
I guess Kenticos wants to get everything done through CMS which is not advisable.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Alfresco vs. Kontent.ai, Alfresco has 13 user reviews and Kontent.ai has 12. The average star rating for Alfresco is 4.38 while Kontent.ai has an average rating of 4.08. Alfresco has more positive reviews than Kontent.ai. Comparing Alfresco vs. Kontent.ai reviews, Alfresco has stronger overall reviews.
Alfresco vs. Kontent.ai both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management System (CMS) Features, File Management, Supported File Formats, Supported Content Types, Collaboration Tools, Workflow Automation, Language & Speech, Customizable Items, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Alfresco vs. Kontent.ai, Kontent.ai offers more of the most popular features and tools than Alfresco.
In our pricing comparison of Alfresco vs. Kontent.ai, Kontent.ai's pricing starts at Free/month and is more affordable compared to Kontent.ai's starting cost of Free/month.
Our comparison of Alfresco vs. Kontent.ai shows that Kontent.ai scores higher in usability for ease of use, setup & support, quality of support. Alfresco scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin, but Kontent.ai has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
