In our comparison of Alfresco vs. Joomla!, Alfresco is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The product excels in managing a vast archive of documents spanning over 25 years. It significantly simplifies document approval processes, facilitates records conversion, and enables efficient archival of older documents.
Effective Document Workflow Functionality. User-Friendly Document Metadata Management. Developer and End-User Friendly Interface
Increasing Complexity of Local Installation Post-Version 5.1.1.4. Customization Deployment Challenges in Alfresco
From the PHP to the SQL database, Joomla offers the programmer the chance to debug simpler, manipulating and developing new templates, module spaces, and global modifications is simple, ability to maintain the updates thanks to the three separate sites on a single set up, and continuous software enhancement from the software’s developers. Our systems now run much faster as Joomla is becoming more restructured and less bloated.
Recently, the security updates have crashed our systems, the developers providing components and modules are minimal and the ones available haven’t been updating for years which is worrying, and the software’s core has some bloat.
It has great customization features, it is compatible with multiple types of files, work flow options are great, it is easy to search for documents, the ability to customize your summary of that project, offering visuals to members thanks to the setting of the dashboard on every site, and the ability to know if the project is website based courtesy of the live browser frame.
The interface could be better, unlocking all the functionality and features available to you takes the usability some time.
The admin panel is great. We can engage in professional development because of plenty of time. The availability of open-source code and many extensions available for different tasks are great.
A longer time is required to study the platform and fully understand the capabilities of Joomla.
The product excels in managing a vast archive of documents spanning over 25 years. It significantly simplifies document approval processes, facilitates records conversion, and enables efficient archival of older documents.
Effective Document Workflow Functionality. User-Friendly Document Metadata Management. Developer and End-User Friendly Interface
Increasing Complexity of Local Installation Post-Version 5.1.1.4. Customization Deployment Challenges in Alfresco
It has great customization features, it is compatible with multiple types of files, work flow options are great, it is easy to search for documents, the ability to customize your summary of that project, offering visuals to members thanks to the setting of the dashboard on every site, and the ability to know if the project is website based courtesy of the live browser frame.
The interface could be better, unlocking all the functionality and features available to you takes the usability some time.
From the PHP to the SQL database, Joomla offers the programmer the chance to debug simpler, manipulating and developing new templates, module spaces, and global modifications is simple, ability to maintain the updates thanks to the three separate sites on a single set up, and continuous software enhancement from the software’s developers. Our systems now run much faster as Joomla is becoming more restructured and less bloated.
Recently, the security updates have crashed our systems, the developers providing components and modules are minimal and the ones available haven’t been updating for years which is worrying, and the software’s core has some bloat.
The admin panel is great. We can engage in professional development because of plenty of time. The availability of open-source code and many extensions available for different tasks are great.
A longer time is required to study the platform and fully understand the capabilities of Joomla.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Alfresco vs. Joomla!, Alfresco has 13 user reviews and Joomla! has 30. The average star rating for Alfresco is 4.38 while Joomla! has an average rating of 4.16. Alfresco has more positive reviews than Joomla!. Comparing Alfresco vs. Joomla! reviews, Alfresco has stronger overall reviews.
Alfresco vs. Joomla! both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management System (CMS) Features, Document Management, Supported Content Types, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Language & Speech, Customizable Items, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Alfresco vs. Joomla!, Joomla! offers more of the most popular features and tools than Alfresco.
In our pricing comparison of Alfresco vs. Joomla!, Joomla!'s pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Joomla!'s starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Alfresco vs. Joomla! shows that Joomla! scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support. Alfresco scores higher in learning curve, ease of admin, but Joomla! has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
