In our comparison of Alfresco vs. Content Central, Content Central is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The product excels in managing a vast archive of documents spanning over 25 years. It significantly simplifies document approval processes, facilitates records conversion, and enables efficient archival of older documents.
Effective Document Workflow Functionality. User-Friendly Document Metadata Management. Developer and End-User Friendly Interface
Increasing Complexity of Local Installation Post-Version 5.1.1.4. Customization Deployment Challenges in Alfresco
The approach gives complete files with front and back notes along with an extensive search tool. The system didn't function flawlessly at first because of a few scanned objects that weren't available right away after scanning, but these were quickly fixed.
The ability to search using different parameters and complete file with front and back notes available
Initially, scanned items were not always available immediately after scanning
It has great customization features, it is compatible with multiple types of files, work flow options are great, it is easy to search for documents, the ability to customize your summary of that project, offering visuals to members thanks to the setting of the dashboard on every site, and the ability to know if the project is website based courtesy of the live browser frame.
The interface could be better, unlocking all the functionality and features available to you takes the usability some time.
This document storage solution met the needs of both simple and complicated workflows with remarkable ease of use. The document tagging and coding queue procedures, however, were a little laborious.
Easy to use, simple workflows
Coding que and tagging of documents are bad
The product excels in managing a vast archive of documents spanning over 25 years. It significantly simplifies document approval processes, facilitates records conversion, and enables efficient archival of older documents.
Effective Document Workflow Functionality. User-Friendly Document Metadata Management. Developer and End-User Friendly Interface
Increasing Complexity of Local Installation Post-Version 5.1.1.4. Customization Deployment Challenges in Alfresco
It has great customization features, it is compatible with multiple types of files, work flow options are great, it is easy to search for documents, the ability to customize your summary of that project, offering visuals to members thanks to the setting of the dashboard on every site, and the ability to know if the project is website based courtesy of the live browser frame.
The interface could be better, unlocking all the functionality and features available to you takes the usability some time.
The approach gives complete files with front and back notes along with an extensive search tool. The system didn't function flawlessly at first because of a few scanned objects that weren't available right away after scanning, but these were quickly fixed.
The ability to search using different parameters and complete file with front and back notes available
Initially, scanned items were not always available immediately after scanning
This document storage solution met the needs of both simple and complicated workflows with remarkable ease of use. The document tagging and coding queue procedures, however, were a little laborious.
Easy to use, simple workflows
Coding que and tagging of documents are bad
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Alfresco vs. Content Central, Alfresco has 13 user reviews and Content Central has 10. The average star rating for Alfresco is 4.38 while Content Central has an average rating of 4.3. Alfresco has more positive reviews than Content Central. Comparing Alfresco vs. Content Central reviews, Alfresco has stronger overall reviews.
Alfresco vs. Content Central both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management, File Management, Supported File Formats, Signature Management, Supported Data Types, Supported Content Types, Collaboration Tools, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Workflow Automation, Customizable Items, Report Management, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Compliance Accreditations, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service, Business Units/Areas Covered. In our feature comparison of Alfresco vs. Content Central, Content Central offers more of the most popular features and tools than Alfresco.
In our pricing comparison of Alfresco vs. Content Central, Content Central's pricing starts at $35/month and is more affordable compared to Content Central's starting cost of $35/month.
Our comparison of Alfresco vs. Content Central shows that Content Central scores higher in usability for ease of use, quality of support, ease of admin. Alfresco scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, but Content Central has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
